*EPF506 01/09/2004
Text: Economic Freedom Brings Immediate Benefits, Group Says
(Heritage Foundation report shows strong correlation with growth, prosperity) (1680)

Countries begin to see benefits from the opening of their economies as soon as they start the liberalization process, a Washington research organization says.

In a January 9 news release, The Heritage Foundation said that the consistent expansion of economic freedoms brings the highest rates of economic growth as well as prosperity. And those countries that slow or stop their progress toward economic freedom see their growth drop. These were the conclusions of the 2004 Index of Economic Freedom report published the same day by the organization jointly with The Wall Street Journal.

The report, published annually since 1995, provides analyses of world economies and government policies and scores countries on 10 measures, including trade policy, fiscal burden of government, property rights and black-market activity. Based on the scores, it classifies countries as free, mostly free, mostly unfree or repressed.

The study found that almost half of the 155 countries analyzed scored better in 2003 than in 2002.

Regional scores for 2003 were mixed; North America, Europe, Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia-Pacific posted gains, while Latin America lost ground and North Africa and the Middle East remained unchanged, according to the 2004 report.

Hong Kong, Singapore and New Zealand led the group of the most economically free countries with the United States No. 10, while North Korea, Libya and Zimbabwe were classified as the least free.

Following is the text of the news release:

(begin text)

The Heritage Foundation

2004 "INDEX OF ECONOMIC FREEDOM" SHOWS
COUNTRIES THAT OPEN THEIR ECONOMIES
EXPERIENCE FASTER GROWTH

Study Finds More Countries Expanding Freedom

Three Regions Post Gains; Latin America Loses Ground

WASHINGTON, JAN. 9, 2004 -- It's a puzzle almost as old as society itself: Why do some economies grow year after year while others remain mired in stagnation? Is there a secret to prosperity? Can others copy it?

There is, and they can, say the editors of the 2004 Index of Economic Freedom. The evidence assembled in this 10th annual country-by-country report on the openness of economies worldwide shows that the road to growth is paved with liberty.

During the last seven years, countries that have done the most to improve their scores on the Index's 10 measures of economic freedom have, in general, experienced the highest rates of economic growth.

The Index, published by The Heritage Foundation and The Wall Street Journal, has long documented that the nations with the most economic freedom are also the most prosperous. Those with the best scores in the 10 categories measured-trade policy, fiscal burden of government, government intervention in the economy, monetary policy, capital flows and foreign investment, banking and finance, wages and prices, property rights, regulation and informal (or black) market activity-enjoy higher standards of living and higher per capita incomes.

The latest data suggest that countries begin to see the benefits of opening their economies simply by starting or continuing the process. The one-fifth of countries surveyed where Index scores improved the most enjoyed an average growth in gross domestic product [GDP] of 4.89 percent. For the one fifth that improved the least, GDP grew at only about half that rate (2.53 percent).

The process works in reverse for those that restrict their economies. According to Index editors Marc Miles, Edwin Feulner and Mary Anastasia O'Grady, if countries slow or stop their progress, growth plummets. The message that governments should take from the new Index is that they can help themselves by starting to adopt economic freedom.

Data gathered for the 2004 Index suggests that many countries are getting the message. Of the 155 countries analyzed, 75 scored better this year than last year and 11 had scores that were unchanged. The scores of 69 countries were worse than they were last year. Overall, 16 countries are classified as having "free" economies, 55 as "mostly free," 72 as "mostly unfree" and 12 as "repressed."

The Most Free: Hong Kong (1st), Singapore (2nd), New Zealand (3rd), Luxembourg (4th), Ireland (5th), Estonia (6th), United Kingdom (7th), Denmark (8th), Switzerland (9th), United States (10th)

The Least Free: Tajikistan (146th), Venezuela (147th), Iran (148th), Uzbekistan (149th), Turkmenistan (150th), Burma (151st), Laos (151st), Zimbabwe (153rd), Libya (154th), North Korea (155th)

Asia remains a continent of extremes. Home to many of the world's most repressed economies, the region also contains the three freest economies -- Hong Kong (which took the top slot for the 10th straight year), Singapore and New Zealand. North America/Europe boasts seven of the top 10 most economically free countries. Sub-Saharan Africa, by contrast, has no free economies. North Africa and the Middle East has just one (the tiny island of Cyprus), as does Latin America and the Caribbean (Chile).

Of all the variables measured by the Index, "monetary policy," which examines inflation controls, demonstrated the most improvement worldwide. Monetary policy scores improved in 30 nations and worsened in only nine, for a net worldwide improvement of 21 countries.

In general, the 2004 Index shows that more governments are refraining from intervening in their economies.

But in a reversal from last year, the "fiscal burden of government" score (which measures how much a government taxes and spends) worsened overall. The cost of government rose in 71 nations and fell in 57.

The editors also note a trend toward declining protection of property rights. Seven nations weakened their safeguards of such rights and none-out of all 155 graded-strengthened them. "Without strong property rights, an investor cannot be sure of his ability to lay claim in a business he builds," the report emphasizes. "As the risk involved in a business venture increases, investors and entrepreneurs are left reluctant and likely to put their money elsewhere."

The editors suspended grading for five countries now in a state of "civil unrest or anarchy": Angola, Burundi, Congo, Sudan and Iraq. A lack of reliable data made it impossible for them to grade Serbia and Montenegro as well. The full text of the 2004 Index, including all charts and graphs, will be available online at www.heritage.org/index. A Spanish-language edition also is being published.

North America and Europe

Not only does this region have the most "free" countries (11), it also boasts the highest number that moved toward greater economic freedom (seven). No country in the region improved more than the Slovak Republic. Its score is 0.27 better this year, making it the eighth most improved worldwide-a feat it achieved by cutting taxes, easing wage and price controls, accelerating the pace of privatization and restructuring the banking sector. But Luxembourg is the most economically free country in the region, followed by Ireland and Estonia. Belarus is the least free.

The performance of Europe is all the more remarkable when one considers that it is saddled with the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) -- an "anti-competitive combination of subsidies designed to give the European farmer an edge," writes The Wall Street Journal's Brian Carney in the Index. "It has grown inexorably and now eats up approximately half of the EU's [European Union] 90 billion euro annual budget."

Latin America and the Caribbean

For the most part, the news from this region is bad. Though 11 of its 26 countries improved their scores, an even higher number of countries (13) saw their economic freedom ebb. Venezuela and Argentina continued to reject sound free-market policies for economic recovery. Not surprisingly, Venezuela, the region's most unfree economy, faces an 80 percent poverty rate.

For the second straight year, Cuba ranks among the 10 most-improved countries. The last bastión of communism in the West improved its monetary policy score but remains "repressed" for a number of reasons, including significant non-tariff barriers. El Salvador improved its Index score enough to become the second freest economy in the region-trailing Chile, whose economy is now classified as "free."

North Africa and the Middle East

Overall economic freedom stayed the same in this region. Eight countries scored better, including Israel, which continued to improve and now ranks as the second-most-free economy in the region behind Bahrain, which remained on top despite a small decline in its score. The United Arab Emirates remains third in the region, despite having the third-largest decline in its score of any country surveyed. Libya has little to show but low inflation and ranked the least free.

Sub-Saharan Africa

Rwanda, one of the world's 10 worst countries last year in terms of declining economic freedom, displayed an astonishing turnaround to become this year's most-improved country. Its progress was part of a promising trend in Africa, as four other countries -- Ethiopia, Cape Verde, Senegal and Mauritania -- finished among this year's 10 most improved. Botswana claimed the region's No. 1 spot, even though its score worsened, and Zimbabwe, with sky-high unemployment and soaring inflation, brought up the rear. With 21 countries improving and 15 declining, this region posted the second-biggest net gain.

Asia-Pacific

Having realized the benefits of economic freedom, Hong Kong, Singapore and New Zealand continued to increase it. Hong Kong has emerged as the world's 10th-largest trading entity thanks to its duty-free port and other pro-trade amenities. It scored better this year in the government intervention category. Singapore's weighted average tariff has reached approximately 0 percent. New Zealand has perfect scores in five of the 10 categories. Laos and Fiji have seen the light and rank among the 10 most improved. Indonesia ranked among the top 10 in declining economic freedom, and North Korea, which makes more money from illegal drugs than from legitimate business, remained the world's least free economy with the worst possible score on all 10 measures.

Marc Miles is director of the Center for International Trade and Economics at The Heritage Foundation, Edwin Feulner is president of The Heritage Foundation, and Mary Anastasia O'Grady edits the "Americas" column and is a senior editorial page writer at the Journal.

(end text)

(Distributed by the Bureau of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)

Return to Public File Main Page

Return to Public Table of Contents