*EPF107 06/10/2002
Text: Kaptur Doubts China Commercial Changes Will Affect Human Rights
(Representative Marcy Kaptur's June 6 statement at hearing) (730)

One of the strongest opponents in the House of Representatives to granting China Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR) status in 2000 warned June 6 that changes in China's commercial law would probably not carry over into greater respect for human rights in that country.

At a hearing of the Congressional-Executive Commission on the People's Republic of China (CECC) on Capitol Hill, Representative Marcy Kaptur (Democrat of Ohio) said it was na��e to expect changes in the Beijing regime through trade liberalization.

While conceding that any improvement in the Beijing regime's rule of law would be "a step in the right direction," she stressed that Chinese officials "must realize that rule of law means that all -- including government officials -- are held accountable and that the law can be used to protect, not just punish."

Kaptur said the Chinese "have been less than willing to keep their promises" when it came to commercial trade agreements.

She cautioned the CECC that while commercial transactions "may have logic," they don't have ethics.

The people of China, Kaptur said, "deserve a sincere effort by their leaders to uphold internationally recognized human rights -- not as a condition of a trade agreement, but as a moral right."

Following is the text of Representative Marcy Kaptur's June 6 testimony to the Congressional-Executive Commission on China:

(begin text)

begin text)

Testimony of Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur

CONGRESSIONAL - EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA WTO:
Will China Keep its Promises? Can it?

June 6, 2002

I would like to thank Congressman Bereuter and Senator Baucus for convening a third hearing for Commission Members. I understand that the staff-led roundtable discussions have been continuing and the future schedule holds some potential.

Today's hearing on World Trade Organization (WTO) regulation implementation is an interesting choice for a hearing topic. As we all know, our Commission was charged with examining and monitoring human rights and the rule of law in China. It is my sincere wish that China will live up to its commitments on implementation. To say that I am skeptical, however, may be an understatement.

Nevertheless, for the purposes of this hearing, I will grant China great leeway. Let us suppose that China diligently works to come into compliance with WTO obligations. Will this lead to a new world of rights and freedoms for the Chinese people? I am doubtful.

Many proponents of Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR) for China purported that China's entry into the WTO would lead to great reforms within Chinese society, creating a near utopia. I did not support unconditional PNTR and I don't support this na��e, if not misleading, future-look. Let's be frank: rarely does commercial law lead to an expansion of human, labor and environmental rights.

I think it is safe to say that we all agree that any improvement in China's rule of law is a step in the right direction. Chinese officials must realize that rule of law means that all - including government officials - are held accountable and that the law can be used to protect, not just punish. Until now, the Chinese have been less than willing to keep their promises when it come to commercial trade agreements. If that nation truly wants to be a world player, I encourage them to prove us wrong, to live well beyond the pessimistic predictions.

Commercial transactions may have logic, but they have no ethic. Most importantly, the people of China deserve a sincere effort by their leaders to uphold internationally recognized human rights - not as a condition of a trade agreement, but as a moral right.

(end text)



(end text)

(Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)

Return to Public File Main Page

Return to Public Table of Contents