Civil Rights Act of 1991



102d CONGRESS

  1ST SESSION        H.R.1



     To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to restore and

strengthen civil rights laws that ban discrimination in

employment, and for other purposes.



                                            



IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES



January 3, 1991



Mr. Brooks (for himself and Mr. Edwards of California, Mr. Fish,

Mr. Gephardt, Mr. Gray, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Fazio, Ms. Schroeder, Ms.

Snowe, Mr. Towns, Mr. Ortiz, Mr. Mineta, and Mr. Matsui)

introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on Education and Labor and the Judiciary



March 8, 1991



Additional sponsors:  Mr. Ford of Michigan, Mr. Clay, Mrs.

Collins of Michigan, Mrs. Collins of Illinois, Mr. Conyers, Mr.

Dellums, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Dymally, Mr. Espy, Mr. Flake, Mr. Ford of

Tennessee, Mr. Hayes of Illinois, Mr. Jefferson, Mr. Lewis of

Georgia, Mr. Mfume, Ms. Norton, Mr. Owens of New York, Mr. Payne

of New Jersey, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Savage, Mr. Stokes, Mr.

Washington, Ms. Waters, Mr. Wheat, Mr. Abercrombie, Mr. Andrews

of Texas, Mr. Andrews of New Jersey, Mr. Andrews of Maine, Mr.

Atkins, Mr. AuCoin, Mr. Bacchus, Mr. Berman, Mr. Bilbray, Mrs.

Boxer, Mr. Brown, Mr. Bryant, Mr. Bustamante, Mr. Cardin, Mr.

Carper, Mr. Coleman of Texas, Mr. Condit, Mr. Coyne, Mr. de Lugo,

Mr. DeFazio, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Dicks, Mr. Dingell, Mr. Downey, Mr.

Durbin, Mr. Dwyer of New Jersey, Mr. Faleomaveaga, Mr. Fascell,

Mr. Feighan, Mr. Foglietta, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr.

Frost, Mr. Fuster, Mr. Gejdenson, Mr. Gibbons, Mr. Glickman, Mr.

Green of New York, Mr. Hall of Ohio, Mr. Hamilton, Mr. Hoagland,

Ms. Horn, Mr. Jacobs, Mr. Johnson of South Dakota, Mr. Jontz, Ms.

Kaptur, Mrs. Kennelly, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Kleczka, Mr. Lantos, Mr.

Lehman of Florida, Mr. Levin of Michigan, Mr. Levine of

California, Mrs. Lowey of New York, Mr. Markey, Mr. Martinez, Mr.

Mavroules, Mr. Mazzoli, Mr. McCloskey, Mr. McDermott, Mr. McHugh,

Mr. McMillen of Maryland, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Miller of California,

Mrs. Mink, Mr. Moody, Mrs. Morella, Mr. Mrazek, Mr. Murphy, Mr.

Nagle, Mr. Neal of Massachusetts, Ms. Oakar, Mr. Oberstar, Mr.

Owens of Utah, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Panetta, Mr. Pease, Ms. Pelosi,

Mr. Penny, Mr. Peterson of Minnesota, Mr. Peterson of Florida,

Mr. Poshard, Mr. Price, Mr. Rahall, Mr. Reed, Mr. Richardson, Mr.

Roybal, Mr. Sabo, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Sawyer, Mr. Scheuer, Mr.

Schumer, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Sharp, Mr. Shays, Mr. Sikorski, Mr.

Slattery, Ms. Slaughter of New York, Mr. Stark, Mr. Studds, Mr.

Swift, Mr. Tallon, Mr. Torres, Mr. Torricelli, Mr. Traficant, Mr.

Traxler, Mr. Udall, Mr. Vento, Mr. Visclosky, Mr. Waxman, Mr.

Weiss, Mr. Williams, Mr. Wolpe, Mr. Wyden, and Mr. Yates



                                          



A BILL



To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to restore and strengthen

civil rights laws that ban discrimination in employment, and for

other purposes.



     Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 



SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.



     This Act may be cited as the "Civil Rights Act of 1991."



SEC.2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.



     (a) FINDINGS.--Congress finds that--



               (1) in a series of recent decisions addressing

employment discrimination claims under Federal law, the Supreme

Court cut back dramatically on the scope and effectiveness of

civil rights protections; 



and



          (2) existing protections and remedies under Federal 

law are not adequate to deter unlawful discrimination or to

compensate victims of such discrimination.



     (b) PURPOSES.--The purposes of this Act are to--



          (1) respond to the Supreme Court's recent decisions by

restoring the civil rights protections that were dramatically

limited by those decisions; and



          (2) strengthen existing protections and remedies

available under Federal civil rights laws to provide more

effective deterrence and adequate compensation for victims of

discrimination.



SEC.3. DEFINITIONS



     Section 701 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C.

2000e) is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new

subsections:



     "(1) The term 'complaining party' means the Commission, the

Attorney General, or a person who may bring an action or

proceeding under this title.



     "(m) The term 'demonstrates' means meets the burdens of

production and persuasion.



     "(n) The term 'group of employment practices' means a

combination of employment practices that produces one or more

decisions with respect to employment, employment referral, or

admission to a labor organization, apprenticeship or other

training or retraining program.



     "(o)(1) The term 'required by business necessity' means--



               "(A) in the case of employment practices involving

selection (such as hiring, assignment, transfer, promotion,

training, apprenticeship, referral, retention, or membership in a

labor organization), the practice or group of practices must bear

a significant relationship to successful performance of the job;

or 



               "(B) in the case of employment practices that do not

involve selection, the practice or group of practices must bear a

significant relationship to a significant business objective of

the employer.



     "(2) In deciding whether the standards in paragraph (1) for

business necessity have been met, unsubstantiated opinion and

hearsay are not sufficient; demonstrable evidence is required. 

The defendant may offer as evidence statistical reports,

validation studies, expert testimony, prior successful experience

and other evidence as permitted by the Federal Rules of Evidence,

and the court shall give such weight, if any, to such evidence as

is appropriate.



     "(3) This subsection is meant to codify the meaning of

'business necessity' as used in Griggs v. Duke Power Co. (401

U.S. 424 (1971)) and to overrule the treatment of business

necessity as a defense in Wards Cove Packing Co., Inc. v. Atonio

(109 S. Ct. 2115 (1989)).



     "(p) The term 'respondent' means an employer, employment

agency, labor organization, joint labor-management committee

controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining

programs, including on-the-job training programs, or those

Federal entities subject to the provisions of section 717 (or the

heads thereof).".



SEC. 4. RESTORING THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN DISPARATE IMPACT CASES.



     Section 703 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C.

2000e-2) is amended by adding at the end thereof the following

new subsection:



     "(k) PROOF OF UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES IN DISPARATE

IMPACT CASES.--(1) An unlawful employment practice based on

disparate impact is established under this section when--

          "(A) a complaining party demonstrates that an

employment practice results in a disparate impact on the basis of

race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, and the

respondent fails to demonstrate that such practice is required by

business necessity; or



          "(B) a complaining party demonstrates that a group of

employment practices results in a disparate impact on the basis

of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, and the

respondent fails to demonstrate that such group of employment

practices is required by business necessity, except that--



               "(i) except as provided in clause (iii), if a

complaining party demonstrates that a group of employment

practices results in a disparate impact, such party shall not be

required to demonstrate which specific practice or practices

within the group results in such disparate impact;



               "(ii) if the respondent demonstrates that a

specific employment practice within such group of employment

practices does not contribute to the disparate impact, the

respondent shall not be required to demonstrate that such

practice is required by business necessity; and



               "(iii) if the court finds that the complaining

party can identify, from records or other information of the

respondent reasonably available (through discovery or otherwise),

which specific practice or practices contributed to the disparate

impact--



                    "(I) the complaining party shall be required

to demonstrate which specific practice or practices contributed

to the disparate impact; and



                    "(II) the respondent shall be required to

demonstrate business necessity only as to the specific practice

or practices demonstrated by the complaining party to have

contributed to the disparate impact;



except that an employment practice or group of employment

practices demonstrated to be required by business necessity shall

be unlawful where a complaining party demonstrates that a

different employment practice or group of employment practices

with less disparate impact would serve the respondent as well.



     "(2) A demonstration that an employment practice is required

by business necessity may be used as a defense only against a

claim under this subsection.



     "(3) Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, a

rule barring the employment of an individual who currently and

knowingly uses or possesses an illegal drug as defined in

Schedules I and II of section 102(6) of the Controlled Substances

Act (21 U.S.C. 802(6)), other than the use or possession of a

drug taken under the supervision of a licensed health care

professional, or any other use or possession authorized by the

Controlled Substances Act or any other provision of Federal law,

shall be considered an unlawful employment practice under this

title only if such rule is adopted or applied with an intent to

discriminate because of the race, color, religion, sex, or

national origin.



     "(4) The mere existence of a statistical imbalance in an

employer's workforce on account of race, color, religion, sex, or

national origin is not alone sufficient to establish a prima

facie case of disparate impact violation."



SEC. 5. CLARIFYING PROHIBITION AGAINST IMPERMISSIBLE

CONSIDERATION OF RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX OR NATIONAL ORIGIN IN

EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES.



     (a) IN GENERAL.--Section 703 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

(42 U.S.C. 2000e-2) (as amended by section 4) is further amended

by adding at the end thereof the following new subsection:



     "(1) DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICE NEED NOT BE SOLE CONTRIBUTING

FACTOR.--Except as otherwise provided in this title, an unlawful

employment practice is established when the complaining party

demonstrates that race, color, religion, sex, or national origin

was a contributing factor for any employment practice, even

though other factors also contributed to such practice.".



     (b) ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS.--Section 706(g) of such Act (42

U.S.C. 2000e-5(g)) is amended by inserting before the period in

the last sentence the following:  "or, in a case where a

violation is established under section 703(1), if the respondent

establishes that it would have taken the same action in the

absence of any discrimination.  In any case in which a violation

is established under section 703(1), damages may be awarded only

for injury that is attributable to the unlawful employment

practice."



SEC. 6. FACILITATING PROMPT AND ORDERLY RESOLUTION OF CHALLENGES

TO EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES IMPLEMENTING LITIGATED OR CONSENT

JUDGMENTS OR ORDERS.



     Section 703 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C.

2000e-2) (as amended by sections 4 and 5) is further amended by

adding at the end thereof the following new subsection:



     "(m) FINALITY OF LITIGATED OR CONSENT JUDGMENTS OR ORDERS.--

(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, and except as

provided in paragraph (2), an employment practice that implements

and is within the scope of a litigated or consent judgment or

order resolving a claim of employment discrimination under the

United States Constitution or Federal civil rights laws may not

be challenged in a claim under the United States Constitution or

Federal civil rights laws--

     "(A) by a person who, prior to the entry of such judgment or

order, had--



          "(i) actual notice from any source of the proposed

judgment or order sufficient to apprise such person that such

judgment or order might affect the interests of such person and

that an opportunity was available to present objections to such

judgment or order; and 



          "(ii) a reasonable opportunity to present objections to

such judgment or order;



     "(B) by a person with respect to whom the requirements of

subparagraph (A) are not satisfied, if the court determines that

the interests of such person were adequately represented by

another person who challenged such judgment or order prior to or

after the entry of such judgment or order; or 



     "(C) if the court that entered the judgment or order

determines that reasonable efforts were made to provide notice to

interested persons.



A determination under subparagraph (C) shall be made prior to the

entry of the judgment or order, except that if the judgment or

order was entered prior to the date of the enactment of this

subsection, the determination may be made at any reasonable time.



     "(2) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to--



          "(A) alter the standards for intervention under rule 24

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or apply to the rights of

parties who have successfully intervened pursuant to such rule in

the proceeding in which they intervened;



          "(B) apply to the rights of parties to the action in

which the litigated or consent judgment or order was entered, or

of members of a class represented or sought to be represented in

such action, or of members of a group on whose behalf relief was

sought in such action by the Federal government; 



          "(C) prevent challenges to a litigated or consent

judgment or order on the ground that such judgment or order was

obtained through collusion or fraud, or is transparently invalid

or was entered by a court lacking subject matter jurisdiction; or



          "(D) authorize or permit the denial to any person of

[sic] the due process of law required by the United States

Constitution.



     "(3) Any action, not precluded under this subsection, that

challenges an employment practice that implements and is within

the scope of a litigated or consent judgment or order of the type

referred to in paragraph (1) shall be brought in the court, and

if possible before the judge, that entered such judgment or

order.  Nothing in this subsection shall preclude a transfer of

such action pursuant to section 1404 of title 28, United States

Code".



SEC. 7. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS; APPLICATION TO CHALLENGES TO

SENIORITY SYSTEMS.



     (a) STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.--Section 706(e) of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(e)) is amended--



     (1) by striking out "one hundred and eighty days" and

inserting in lieu thereof "2 years";



     (2) by inserting after "occurred" the first time it

appears "or has been applied to affect adversely the person

aggrieved, whichever is later,";



     (3) by striking out ", except that in" and inserting in

lieu thereof ".In"; and 



     (4) by striking out "such charge shall be filed" and

all that follows through "whichever is earlier, and".



     (b) APPLICATION TO CHALLENGES TO SENIORITY SYSTEMS.--Section

703(h) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 2000e-2) is amended by inserting

after the first sentence the following new sentence:  "Where a

seniority system or seniority practice is part of a collective

bargaining agreement and such system or practice was included in

such agreement with the intent to discriminate on the basis of

race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, the application

of such system or practice during the period that such collective

bargaining agreement is in effect shall be an unlawful employment

practice."



SEC. 8. PROVIDING FOR DAMAGES IN CASES OF INTENTIONAL

DISCRIMINATION.



     Section 706(g) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C.

2000e-5(g)) is amended by inserting before the last sentence the

following new sentences:  "With respect to an unlawful employment

practice (other than an unlawful employment practice established

in accordance with section 703(k)) or in the case of an unlawful

employment practice under the Americans with Disabilities Act of

1990 (other than an unlawful employment practice established in

accordance with paragraph (3)(A) or paragraph (6) of section 102

of that Act) as it relates to standards and criteria that tend to

screen out individuals with disabilities)--



               "(A) compensatory damages may be awarded; and



               "(B) if the respondent (other than a government,

government agency, or a political subdivision) engaged in the

unlawful employment practice with malice, or with reckless or

callous indifference to the federally protected rights of others,

punitive damages may be awarded against such respondent;



in addition to the relief authorized by the preceding sentences

of this subsection, except that compensatory damages shall not

include backpay or any interest thereon.  Compensatory and

punitive damages and jury trials shall be available only for

claims of intentional discrimination.  If compensatory or

punitive damages are sought with respect to a claim of

intentional discrimination arising under this title, any party

may demand a trial by jury."



SEC. 9. CLARIFYING ATTORNEY'S FEES PROVISION.



     Section 706(k) of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 (42 U.S.C.

2000e-5(k)) is amended--



               (1) by inserting "(1)" after "(k)";

               (2) by inserting "(including expert fees and other

litigation expenses) and" after "attorney's fee,";

               (3) by striking out "as part of the"; and

               (4) by adding at the end thereof the following:



     "(2) No consent order or judgment settling a claim under

this title shall be entered, and no stipulation of dismissal of a

claim under this title shall be effective, unless the parties or

their counsel attest to the court that a waiver of all or

substantially all attorney's fees was not compelled as a

condition of the settlement.



     "(3) In any action or proceeding in which any judgment or

order granting relief under this title is challenged, the court,

in its discretion and in order to promote fairness, may allow the

prevailing party in the original action (other than the

Commission or the United States) to recover from either an

unsuccessful party challenging such relief or a party against

whom relief was granted in the original action or from more than

one such party under an equitable allocation determined by the

court, a reasonable attorney's fee (including expert fees and

other litigation expenses) and costs reasonably incurred in

defending (as a party, intervenor or otherwise) such judgment or

order.  In determining whether to allow recovery of fees from the

party challenging the initial judgment or order, the court should

consider not only whether such challenge was unsuccessful, but

also whether the award of fees against the challenging party

promotes fairness, taking into consideration such factors as the

reasonableness of the challenging party's legal and factual

position and whether other special circumstances make an award

unjust.".



SEC. 10. PROVIDING FOR INTEREST, AND EXTENDING THE STATUTE OF

LIMITATIONS, IN ACTIONS AGAINST THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.



          Section 717 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C.

2000e-16) is amended--



     (1) in subsection (c), by striking out "thirty days" and

inserting in lieu thereof "ninety days"; and



     (2) in subsection (d), by inserting before the period ", and

the same interest to compensate for delay in payment shall be

available as in cases involving non-public parties, except that

prejudgment interest may not be awarded on compensatory damages".



SEC. 11. CONSTRUCTION.



     Title XI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000h et

seq.) is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new

section:



"SEC. 1107. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION FOR CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS.



     "(a) EFFECTUATION OF PURPOSE.--All Federal laws protecting

the civil rights of persons shall be interpreted consistent with

the intent of such laws, and shall be broadly construed to

effectuate the purpose of such laws to provide equal opportunity

and provide effective remedies.



     "(b) NONLIMITATION.--Except as expressly provided, no

Federal law protecting the civil rights of persons shall be

construed  to repeal or amend by implication any other Federal

law protecting such civil rights.



     "(c) INTERPRETATION.--In interpreting Federal civil rights

laws, including laws protecting against discrimination on the

basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, and

disability, courts and administrative agencies shall not rely on

the amendments made by the Civil Rights Act of 1990 as a basis

for limiting the theories of liability, rights, and remedies

available under civil rights laws not expressly amended by such

Act."



SEC. 12. RESTORING PROHIBITION AGAINST ALL RACIAL DISCRIMINATION

IN THE MAKING AND ENFORCEMENT OF CONTRACTS.



     Section 1977 of the Revised Statutes of the United States

(42 U.S.C. 1981) is amended--



          (1) by inserting "(a)" before "All persons within"; and

          (2) by adding at the end thereof the following new

subsections:



     "(b) For purposes of this section, the right to 'make and

enforce contracts' shall include the making, performance,

modification and termination of contracts, and the enjoyment of

all benefits, privileges, terms and conditions of the contractual

relationship.

      "(c) The rights protected by this section are protected

against impairment by nongovernmental discrimination as well as

against impairment under color of State law."



SEC. 13. LAWFUL COURT-ORDERED REMEDIES, AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND

CONCILIATION AGREEMENTS NOT AFFECTED.



     Nothing in the amendments made by this Act shall be

construed to require or encourage an employer to adopt hiring or

promotion quotas on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or

national origin:  Provided, however, That nothing in the

amendments made by this Act shall be construed to affect court-

ordered remedies, affirmative action, or conciliation agreements

that are otherwise in accordance with the law.



SEC. 14. SEVERABILITY.



     If any provision of this Act, or an amendment made by this

Act, or the application of such provision to any person or

circumstances is held to be invalid, the remainder of this Act

and the amendments made by this Act, and the application of such

provision to other persons and circumstances, shall not be

affected thereby.



SEC. 15. APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS AND TRANSITION RULES.



     (a) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.--The amendments made by--



          (1) section 4 shall apply to all proceedings pending on

or commenced after June 5, 1989; 



          (2) section 5 shall apply to all proceedings pending on

or commenced after May 1, 1989; 



          (3) section 6 shall apply to all proceedings pending on

or commenced after June 12, 1989;



          (4) sections 7(a)(1), 7(a)(3) and 7(a)(4), 7(b), 8, 9,

10, and 11 shall apply to all proceedings pending on or commenced

after the date of enactment of this Act; 



          (5) section 7(a)(2) shall apply to all proceedings

pending on or commenced after June 12, 1989; and 



          (6) section 12 shall apply to all proceedings pending

on or commenced after June 15, 1989.



(b) TRANSITION RULES.--



          (1) IN GENERAL.--Any orders entered by a court between

the effective dates described in subsection (a) and the date of

enactment of this Act that are inconsistent with the amendments

made by sections 4, 5, 7(a)(2), or 12, shall be vacated if, not

later than 1 year after such date of enactment, a request for

such relief is made.



          (2) SECTION 6.--Any orders entered between June 12,

1989 and the date of enactment of this Act, that permit a

challenge to an employment practice that implements a litigated

or consent judgment or order and that is inconsistent with the

amendment made by section 6, shall be vacated if, not later than

6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, a request for

such relief is made.  For the 1-year period beginning on the date

of enactment of this Act, an individual whose challenge to an

employment practice that implements a litigated or consent

judgment or order is denied under the amendment made by section

6, or whose order or relief obtained under such challenge is

vacated under such section, shall have the same right of

intervention in the case in which the challenged litigated or

consent judgment or order was entered as that individual had on

June 12, 1989.



     (c) PERIOD OF LIMITATIONS.--The period of limitations for

the filing of a claim or charge shall be tolled from the

applicable effective date described in subsection (a) until the

date of enactment of this Act, on a showing that the claim or

charge was not filed because of a rule or decision altered by the

amendments made by sections 4, 5, 7(a)(2), or 12.



SEC. 16. CONGRESSIONAL COVERAGE.



     Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e

et seq.) is amended by adding at the end thereof the following

new section:



"SEC. 719. CONGRESSIONAL COVERAGE.



     "Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, the

provisions of this title shall apply to the Congress of the

United States, and the means for enforcing this title as such

applies to each House of Congress shall be as determined by such

House of Congress.".



SEC. 17. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS; NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUE.



     (a) STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.--Section 7(d) of the Age

Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (29 U.S.C. 626(d)) is

amended--



          (1) in paragraph (1)--



               (A) by striking out "180 days" and inserting in

lieu thereof "2 years"; and



               (B) by inserting "or has been applied to affect

adversely the person aggrieved, whichever is later" after

"occurred"; and 

          (2) in paragraph (2), by striking out "within 300 days"

and all that follows through "whichever is earlier" and inserting

in lieu thereof "a copy of such charge shall be filed by the

Commission with the State agency".



     (b) NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUE..--Section 7(e) of such Act (29

U.S.C. 626(e)) is amended--



          (1) by striking out paragraph (2); 



          (2) by striking out the paragraph designation in

paragraph (1);



          (3) by striking out "Sections 6 and" and inserting

"Section"; and



          (4) by adding at the end thereof the following:  "If a

charge filed with the Commission is dismissed by the Commission,

the Commission shall so notify the person aggrieved and within 90

days after the giving of such notice a civil action may be

brought against the respondent named in the charge by a person

defined in section 11 (29 U.S.C. 630).".



SEC. 18. ALTERNATIVE MEANS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION.



     Where appropriate and to the extent authorized by law, the

use of alternative means of dispute resolution, including

settlement negotiations, conciliation, facilitation, mediation,

factfinding, minitrials, and arbitration, is encouraged to

resolve disputes arising under the Acts amended by this Act.



                            ********



 





.