05 June 2000
Executive Summary, National Commission on Terrorism Report
Terrorists today "seek to inflict mass casualties" in the United
States and overseas, according to a new 44-page report issued June 5
by the bipartisan National Commission on Terrorism.
The 10-person commission, led by former U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for
Counter-Terrorism L. Paul Bremer, calls on the U.S. government to
prepare more aggressively against a future terrorist attack that may
employ biological, chemical, nuclear, or radiological materials.
The report, which was issued following a six-month study by the
commission, says the Department of Defense should have ready detailed
plans to respond logistically in the event of a catastrophic terrorist
attack that could kill tens of thousands of people in the United
States. The plans should include criteria for decisions on the
transfer of command authority to the Defense Department "in
extraordinary circumstances," according to the report's executive
summary.
The report also calls on the U.S. Secretary of State to push for an
international convention to improve multilateral cooperation on
preventing or responding to cyber-terrorist attacks. "Without
international cooperation, the United States cannot protect its
national infrastructure from the cyber threat," the report states.
The report, which has been sent to the President and Congress, says
the United States should seek to use all means available to block or
disrupt private sources of financial and logistical support to
terrorists. Among several recommendations, it says the U.S. should
ratify the International Convention for the Suppression of Financing
of Terrorism.
Iran, Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Greece are all mentioned
specifically in the report. It says Iran and Syria should remain on
the State Department's list of state-sponsors of terrorism until those
two countries "stop supporting terrorists." It also says that the
Secretary of State should designate Afghanistan as a state sponsor of
terrorism, subject to all applicable sanctions. Finally, while not
identified as direct sponsors of terrorism, the authors suggest that
the President should consider imposing sanctions on Greece and
Pakistan for "not cooperating fully on counterterrorism."
The report also recommends that senior U.S. officials should be
required to participate annually in national exercises to test
counterterrorism-response capabilities.
Members of the commission include former Under Secretary of Defense
for Policy Fred Ikle, former CIA Director James Woolsey, former
commander-in-chief of the U.S. Special Operations Command, Army
General Wayne Downing, and former Representative Jane Harman.
Following is the text of the executive summary of the report.
International terrorism poses an increasingly dangerous and difficult
threat to America. This was underscored by the December 1999 arrests
in Jordan and at the U.S./Canadian border of foreign nationals who
were allegedly planning to attack crowded millennium celebrations.
Today's terrorists seek to inflict mass casualties, and they are
attempting to do so both overseas and on American soil. They are less
dependent on state sponsorship and are, instead, forming loose,
transnational affiliations based on religious or ideological affinity
and a common hatred of the United States. This makes terrorist attacks
more difficult to detect and prevent.
Countering the growing danger of the terrorist threat requires
significantly stepping up U.S. efforts. The government must
immediately take steps to reinvigorate the collection of intelligence
about terrorists' plans, use of all available legal avenues to disrupt
and prosecute terrorist activities and private sources of support,
convince other nations to cease all support for terrorists, and ensure
that federal, state, and local officials are prepared for attacks that
may result in mass casualties. The Commission has made a number of
recommendations to accomplish these objectives:
- CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) guidelines adopted in 1995
restricting recruitment of unsavory sources should not apply when
recruiting counterterrorism sources.
- The Attorney General should ensure that the FBI (Federal Bureau of
Investigation) is exercising fully its authority for investigating
suspected terrorist groups or individuals, including authority for
electronic surveillance.
- Funding for counterterrorism efforts by the CIA, NSA (National
Security Agency), and FBI must be given higher priority to ensure
continuation of important operational activity and to close the
technology gap that threatens their ability to collect and exploit
terrorist communications.
- The FBI should establish a cadre of reports officers to distill and
disseminate terrorism-related information once it is collected.
U.S. policies must firmly target all states that support terrorists.
- Iran and Syria should be kept on the list of state sponsors until
they stop supporting terrorists.
- Afghanistan should be designated a sponsor of terrorism and
subjected to all the sanctions applicable to state sponsors.
- The President should impose sanctions on countries that, while not
direct sponsors of terrorism, are nevertheless not cooperating fully
on counterterrorism. Candidates for consideration include Pakistan and
Greece.
Private sources of financial and logistical support for terrorists
must be subjected to the full force and sweep of the U.S. and
international laws.
- All relevant agencies should use every available means, including
the full array of criminal, civil, and administrative sanctions to
block or disrupt non-governmental sources of support for international
terrorism.
- Congress should promptly ratify and implement the International
Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism to
enhance international cooperative efforts.
- Where criminal prosecution is not possible, the Attorney General
should vigorously pursue the expulsion of terrorists from the United
States through proceedings which protect both the national security
interest in safeguarding classified evidence and the right of the
accused to challenge that evidence.
A terrorist attack involving a biological agent, deadly chemicals, or
nuclear or radiological material, even if it succeeds only partially,
could profoundly affect the entire nation. The government must do more
to prepare for such an event.
- The President should direct the preparation of a manual to guide
the implementation of existing legal authority in the event of a
catastrophic terrorist threat or attack. The President and Congress
should determine whether additional legal authority is needed to deal
with catastrophic terrorism.
- The Department of Defense (DOD) must have detailed plans for its
role in the event of a catastrophic terrorist attack, including
criteria for decisions on transfer of command authority to DOD in
extraordinary circumstances.
- Senior officials of all government agencies involved in responding
to a catastrophic terrorism threat or crisis should be required to
participate in national exercises every year to test capabilities and
coordination.
- Congress should make it illegal for anyone not properly certified
to possess certain critical pathogens and should enact laws to control
the transfer of equipment critical to the development or use of
biological agents.
- The President should establish a comprehensive and coordinated
long-term research and development program for catastrophic terrorism.
- The Secretary of State should press for an international convention
to improve multilateral cooperation on preventing or responding to
cyber attacks by terrorists.
The President and Congress should reform the system for reviewing and
funding departmental counterterrorism programs to ensure that the
activities and programs of various agencies are part of a
comprehensive plan.
- The executive branch official responsible for coordinating
counterterrorism efforts across the government should be given a
stronger hand in the budget process.
- Congress should develop a mechanism for a comprehensive review of
the President's counterterrorism policy and budget.
(Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S.
Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)
Return to the Washington File
|