![]() |
![]() |
12 April 2000
Transcript: Drug Czar on National Drug Control Strategy(Annual report shows progress in anti-drug efforts) (1600) The White House Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) reported steady progress in the war on drugs in 1999, with reduced rates of use appearing among both adults and youngsters. At the same time, the report acknowledged the consequences of drug abuse and the need for social vigilance to overcome them. The annual report is mandated by Congress, and updates the ten-year anti-drug strategy drawn up by ONDCP about a year ago. ONDCP Director Barry McCaffrey presented some excerpts and highlights of the report in an appearance before a Congressional committee March 23, as he began the discussion about funding for his office in the next fiscal year. Major points in his testimony: -- Drug usage rates remain steadily below the high rate of usage documented in the late 1970s. -- Adolescent drug use is down from higher rates in the early 90's. -- The dangers of drug abuse are devastating to public health. -- Drug usage remains a serious problem among the criminal element. -- Drug use on the job is estimated to cost more than $14,000 million in lost productivity per year. The report can be viewed in its entirety at http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/policy/ndcs.html Following are excerpts of McCaffrey's testimony to Congress: (begin transcript) STATEMENT OF BARRY R. MCCAFFREY, Director, Office of National Drug Control Policy Before the House Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Treasury, Postal Service and General Government ONDCP's Fiscal Year 2001 Budget March 23, 2000 I. OVERVIEW OF THE NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL STRATEGY The Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 1998 (P. L. 105-277) required the President to submit to Congress a comprehensive, long-term strategy for reducing drug abuse and the consequences of drug abuse in the United States by limiting the availability of and reducing the demand for illegal drugs. The operative five year strategy was submitted in February 1999. The five goals and thirty-one supporting objectives first established in the 1996 National Drug Control Strategy that serve as the basis for a coherent, long-term national effort remain the heart of the Strategy and will guide federal drug control agencies over the five-year period. The Strategy takes a long-term, holistic view of the nation's drug problem and recognizes the devastating effect drug abuse has on the nation's public health and safety. The Strategy maintains that no single solution can suffice to deal with this multifaceted challenge. The Strategy focuses on prevention, treatment, research, law enforcement, protection of our borders, drug supply reduction, and international cooperation. Through a balanced array of demand-reduction and supply-reduction actions, the nation's goal is to achieve a 50 percent decrease in drug use and availability and at least a 25 percent decrease in the consequences of drug abuse by 2007. If this goal is achieved, just 3 percent of the household population aged twelve and over would use illegal drugs. This level would be the lowest documented drug-use rate in American history. The Strategy's five goals are: 1. Educate and enable America's youth to reject illegal drugs as well as alcohol and tobacco. 2. Increase the safety of America's citizens by substantially reducing drug-related crime and violence. 3. Reduce health and social costs to the public of illegal drug use. 4. Shield America's air, land, and sea frontiers from the drug threat. 5. Break foreign and domestic drug sources of supply. The five goals organize thirty-one objectives that are narrowly focused and stipulate the specific ways in which the goals will be attained. Under the prevention goal (Goal 1), for example, nine supporting objectives articulate the specific ways that illegal drug use and underage consumption of alcohol and tobacco products will be reduced. Programmatic initiatives are tied directly to one or more of these objectives. The National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign, for example, supports Goal 1, Objective 2 - pursue a vigorous advertising and public communications program. It also supports Goal 1, Objective 7 - create partnerships with the media, entertainment industry, and professional sports organizations. Progress towards the Strategy's goals and objectives is gauged through the supporting Performance Measurement of Effectiveness (PME) system. The PME system fulfills 3 congressional guidelines that the Strategy contain measurable objectives and specific targets to accomplish long-term quantifiable goals. The nucleus of the PME system consists of twelve "impact targets" that define measurable results to be achieved by the Strategy's five goals. There are five impact targets for demand reduction, five for supply reduction, and two for reducing the adverse health and criminal consequences associated with drug use and trafficking. Eighty-seven additional targets further delineate mid- (2002) and long-term (2007) targets for the Strategy's thirty-one objectives. A number of these are stretch targets in that they require progress above that attained in previous years. This system is in accordance with recommendations from the National Academy of Public Administration, the General Accounting Office, and other organizations advocating good government practices. The overall performance system is described in detail within a companion volume to this Strategy -- Performance Measures of Effectiveness: 2000 Report. II. HIGHLIGHTS OF ONDCP'S 2000 ANNUAL REPORT Public Law 105-277 also requires the President to submit to Congress an Annual Report on the progress in implementing the Strategy. General reporting requirements for the Annual Report include: 1. Assessment of federal success in achieving the National Drug Control Strategy goals and objectives (using the Strategy's Performance Measures of Effectiveness system). This analysis includes an assessment of drug use and availability in the United States as well as prevention, treatment, law enforcement, interdiction, and international programs. 2. Modifications during the preceding year of the National Drug Control Strategy or national drug control performance measurement system. 3. An explanation of how the Administration's budget proposal is intended to implement the National Drug Control Strategy and how proposed funding levels will help do so. 4. Measurable data from the annual performance measures. 5. An assessment of private-sector initiatives and cooperative efforts dealing with drug control among federal, state, and local governments. ONDCP has prepared the following documents in compliance with these requirements: --The National Drug Control Strategy Annual Report --Drug Control Budget: FY 2001 --Performance Measures of Effectiveness: Implementation and Findings --Counterdrug Research and Development Blueprint --National Drug Use Rates Are Steady At Half Peak Rate Of 1979: Overall drug use rates remained steady in the 1990s. An estimated 13.6 million Americans (6.2%) twelve years of age and older were current users of any illegal drug in 1998. This number is slightly less than the 13.9 million estimate for 1997. Drug use reached peak levels in 1979 when 14.1 percent of the population age twelve and over were current users. Since 1996 the number of current users remained steady, with statistically insignificant changes occurring each year. --1991-1995 Trend of Increasing Drug Use by Adolescents Has Been Halted: In 1998, 9.9 percent of youth age twelve to seventeen reported current use of an illegal drug - a 13 percent decrease from 11.4 percent in 1997. This decline was the first statistically significant drop in four years. Teen attitudes toward drugs are improving - the percentage of teens who strongly agreed with the statement, "kids who are really cool don't use drugs," increased from 35 percent in 1998 to 40 percent in 1999. --The Consequences of Drug Abuse are Devastating: Using a methodology that incorporates deaths from other drug-related causes, ONDCP estimates that in 1995 there were 52,624 drug-related deaths. This figure includes 14,218 drug-induced deaths for that year, plus mortalities from drug-related causes. In 1998, there were an estimated 542,544 drug-related emergency department episodes and 982,856 emergency department drug mentions in the coterminous United States. These figures have remained relatively stable from 1997. Illegal drugs accounted for an estimated $110 billion in expenses and lost revenue. --The Tragic Cycle of Drugs and Crime must be Broken: While national crime rates have declined dramatically, more than 1.6 million Americans were arrested for drug-law violations in 1998 - a decrease of one percent from 1997. More than two-thirds of adult male arrestees and half of juvenile male arrestees tested positive for at least one drug in fifteen of thirty-five sites in 1998. 22 percent of inmates in state prisons are incarcerated for drug-law violations; 60 percent of inmates in federal prison are incarcerated for drug-law violations. --Illegal Drugs Impair Workplace Productivity. Almost 75 percent of current drug users aged 18-49 are employed full or part-time - more than 8 million workers. As national unemployment rates decreased, rates of drug use among the unemployed have risen. In 1998, 18.2 percent of unemployed adults aged eighteen or older were current illicit drug users, compared to 13.8 percent in 1997. Drug use is estimated to cost $14 billion a year in decreased productivity. In 1997, those who reported current illegal drug use were more likely than those who reported no drug use to have worked for three or more employers in the past year (9.3 percent versus 4.3 percent), to have skipped one or more days of work in the past month (12.9 percent versus 5 percent), or to have voluntarily left an employer in the past year (24.8 percent versus 15.4 percent). (end transcript) (Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)Return | Global Issues Home Page Return to the Washington File |
This site is produced and maintained by the U.S. Department of State. Links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views contained therein. ![]() |
![]() IIP Home | What's New | Index to This Site | Webmaster | Search This Site | Archives | U.S. Department of State |