U.S. Dept. of State - IIP: The United States and China

Transcript: Clinton Statement on Senate China PNTR Vote
(Agreement will extend U.S. prosperity, Chinese economic freedom)

President Clinton September 19 praised the overwhelming vote in the Senate for legislation that grants China Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR) status, calling it a "landmark agreement."

Appearing in the White House briefing room shortly after the Senate voted 83-15 to approve the legislation, Clinton said the measure "will extend economic prosperity at home and promote economic freedom in China, increasing the prospects for openness in China and a more peaceful future for all of us."

The House of Representatives had passed the same legislation May 24 by a 237-197 margin.

Clinton said the new law will give the United States "a chance -- not a certainty, but a chance -- to strengthen our prosperity and our security, and to see China become a more open society. Now our test as a nation is whether we can achieve that. I hope and I strongly believe that we will."

Asked what incentive China will have to listen to U.S. concerns about human rights and weapons proliferation, Clinton said that already, on the proliferation front, "we've made a lot of progress. China signed the Chemical Weapons Convention, the Biological Weapons Convention, the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, and they worked with us to stop transfers that we thought were destructive, and on more than one occasion."

Problems persist, Clinton said, but "the incentive they will have is that more and more countries will want to become more and more involved with them as long as they feel that they're becoming more responsible members of the international community."

THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
September 19, 2000
REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT ON SENATE PASSAGE OF CHINA PERMANENT NORMAL TRADE RELATIONS
The James S. Brady Briefing Room
3:42 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT: Good afternoon. Today the Senate voted to pave the way for permanent normal trade relations between the United States and China. This landmark agreement will extend economic prosperity at home and promote economic freedom in China, increasing the prospects for openness in China and a more peaceful future for all of us.

When we open markets abroad to U.S. goods, we open opportunities at home. This vote will do that. In return for normal trade relations -- the same terms of trade we offer now to more than 130 other countries -- China will open its markets to American products from wheat, to cars, to consulting services. And we will be far more able to sell goods in China without moving our factories there.

But there is much more at stake here than our economic self-interests; it's about building a world in which more human beings have more freedom, more control over their lives, more contact with others than ever before. A world in which countries are tied more closely together, and the prospects for peace are strengthened.

Trade alone won't create this kind of world, but bringing China under global rules of trade is a step in the right direction. The more China opens its markets to our products, the wider it opens its doors to economic freedom, and the more fully it will liberate the potential of its people.

When China finishes its negotiations and joins the WTO, our high-tech companies will help to speed the information revolution there. Outside competition will speed the demise of China's huge state industries and spur the enterprise of private sector involvement.

They will diminish the role of government in people's daily lives. It will strengthen those within China who fight for higher labor standards, a cleaner environment, for human rights and the rule of law.

And we will find, I believe, that America has more influence in China with an outstretched hand than with a clenched fist. Of course, none of us should think for a moment that any of these outcomes are guaranteed. The advance of freedom ultimately will depend upon what people in China are willing to do to continue standing up for change. We will continue to help support them.

Peace and security in Asia will depend upon our military presence, our alliances, on stopping the spread of deadly weapons. So we will continue to be a force for peace, and we will not rest in our efforts to make sure that freer trade also is fairer trade.

These are some of the most important issues that our nation faces. That's why this vote was so important and, for many, so difficult. I want to thank Senator Lott and Senator Daschle, Senator Roth, Senator Moynihan and Senator Baucus, as well as those who led our effort in the House, and everyone within this administration who worked so hard to achieve this important milestone.

But I also want to acknowledge those who raised important questions about this policy, and say to you this is not the end of the story, it is the beginning. We have a chance -- not a certainty, but a chance -- to strengthen our prosperity and our security and to see China become a more open society. Now our test as a nation is whether we can achieve that. I hope, and I strongly believe, that we will.

Q: Now that they have the trade bill, sir, what incentive will China have to listen to our concerns about human rights and weapons proliferation?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, first of all, on the proliferation front, let me point out that we've made a lot of progress. China signed the Chemical Weapons Convention, the Biological Weapons Convention, the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. And they work with us to stop transfers that we thought were destructive on more than one occasion.

Are there still problems? Yes, there are. I think that the incentive they will have is that more and more countries will want to become more and more involved with them as long as they feel that they're becoming more responsible members of the international community. And also, they'll have other ways to earn money over the long run that are responsible, legal, and actually socially beneficial.

And I also believe that they have shown in other ways that they would like to be partners in the international system, and assume a leadership role that is constructive. All of this will be possible if there is a common course on nonproliferation. Furthermore, I think that all big countries will come to see that their own personal interests are more advanced by nonproliferation than by having various entities within the country make a quick buck through proliferation. It's not good politics, and it's certainly not good for national security.

(Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)