Excerpts: Clinton Links Passage of China PNTR with U.S. Security
(May 21 remarks at Democratic Leadership Council meeting)President Clinton told Democratic supporters May 21 that granting Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR) status to China is necessary so the United States can get the economic benefits of the agreement it reached with China on the terms of that country's entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO).
Speaking at a Democratic Leadership Council retreat in Hyde Park, New York, home of four-term President Franklin Roosevelt, Clinton told Democratic Party members that PNTR is even more important to American security.
"This is a membership agreement," Clinton said. "All we give them is membership, and they do all the market opening. And that's their dues for membership in this World (Trade) Organization."
"That's why, in narrow self-interested terms, it's a 100 to nothing deal not only (for) the United States, but for anybody else who ... votes to let the Chinese into the WTO," he continued.
"Even though for me the economic choice is clear," Clinton said, "far, far more important to me are the moral and national security arguments."
Shaking hands with young people in a crowd that greeted him on arrival in New York, Clinton said he was "reminded again that we fought three wars in Asia in the last half of the 20th century, and that we have a chance to build a different future."
Not a guarantee, he admitted, "but a chance."
Following are excerpts from the White House transcript of the President's speech:
(begin excerpts)
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
May 21, 2000
REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
AT DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP COUNCIL RETREAT
Franklin Delano Roosevelt Presidential Library
Hyde Park, New York
THE PRESIDENT: And last, we will continue to lead the world away from terror, weapons of mass destruction, and destructive ethnic, racial and religious conflicts, toward greater cooperation and shared peace and prosperity.
That's what this vote about China is all about. Yes, it's a good economic deal. China has agreed to open its markets. I just stopped, when I got out of the airplane here, where I drove up here there were a few hundred people at the airport. So I went over and shook hands and said hello to all the children. And this guy says, you really think this China thing is a good deal? I said, yes, it is -- I do. (Laughter.) And he said, why? And I said, well, in the first place, we've been calling it a trade agreement and it isn't. I said, you know, when I made the agreement with Mexico and Canada, it was a trade agreement. So I got a few things and I had to give up a few things. I said, this is a membership agreement. All we give them is membership, and they do all the market opening. And that's their dues for membership in this World Organization.
That's why, in narrow self-interested terms, it's a 100 to nothing deal not only from the United States, but for anybody else who lets the Chinese -- votes to let the Chinese into the WTO. But, even though for me the economic choice is clear, I have to tell you, far, far more important to me are the moral and national security arguments. I looked at all those kids in that crowd today I was shaking hands with, and I was reminded again that we fought three wars in Asia in the last half of the 20th century, and that we have a chance to build a different future. Not a guarantee, but a chance.
Yes, China is still a one-party state, restricting rights of free speech and religious expression, doing things from time to time that frustrate us and even anger us. But by forcing China to slash subsidies and tariffs that protect inefficient industries, which the Communist Party has long used to exercise day-to-day control, by letting our high-tech companies in to bring the Internet and the information revolution to China, we will be unleashing forces that no totalitarian operation rooted in the last century's industrial society can control.
Two years ago there were 2 million Internet users in China; last year there were 9 million; this year there are something over 20 million. At some point there will be over 100 million, and at some point, some threshold that no one can identify with precision will be crossed and it will be a very different world.
And I think it is worth also pointing out that the more China operates within rule-based systems, with us and with other countries, the more likely they are to see the benefit of the rule of law, and the more likely that benefit is to flow down to ordinary people -- in those 900,000 villages where they're already electing their mayors, and in other places.
So this is very important. I think it is quite interesting that the people who hope we will (get) beat this next week in China are the ultraconservatives in the military and the state-owned industries. And quite interesting that people who have been persecuted in China and other places, by and large, want us to adopt this, want us to vote yes on PNTR.
Martin Lee, the head of the democracy movement in Hong Kong, came all the way over here to ask Congress to vote for this. This is a man who cannot, himself, go to China; a man who has never met Zhu Rongji; a man who is still considered persona non grata. But he said to me, he said, you know, we've got to back the reformers in China. We've got to get them into a system where there is rule of law. We have got to move this way. This is the next big step. All the human rights activists in America are, I think, he said, blinded by their opposition to things that have happened in the past and may be happening now, instead of thinking about what is most likely to change China in the future. The new President of Taiwan supports us letting China into the WTO and America extending PNTR. And yesterday, the Dalai Lama, a man who has undergone literally decades of frustration in his dealings with China, strongly endorsed PNTR with China.
So this is a big deal to me, beyond the obvious economic benefits which make it easier for some members and others to vote for because of the economic makeup of their districts. You have to understand that by far the bigger issue is what can we do to promote human rights, what can we do to promote the rule of law, what can we do to minimize the chances that there will be another war in Asia in our lifetime, or in our children's lifetime. To me, that is what is at issue.
So that's my pitch here. What you're about to do is really important. I've told you the kinds of things that I hope you'll do. But those of you out here listening to me will have a bigger role than me in the next 10 years of America. If you just remember what I did with that New Orleans Declaration today, and every specific thing that I could cite to you that grew right out of that. It really matters whether you think and whether you put your feelings into organized fashion, and whether that then organizes the process for developing specific policies.
And what happens in 2000, fundamentally is just as important as what happened in '92 and '96, because what a country does with its prosperity is just as stern a test of its character and vision and wisdom as what it does when its back is against the wall.
I've done everything I could to turn the ship of state around. Now you've got to make sure that it keeps sailing in the right direction.
Thank you and God bless you. (Applause.)
(end excerpts)
(Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)
Return to The United States and China.Return to IIP Home Page.