Excerpt: President Clinton March 1 Remarks on China WTO/NTR Debate
(U.S. can influence China more by "giving them a chance")The Administration's support for permanent Normal Trade Relations (NTR) status and World Trade Organization (WTO) accession for China is about more than money, President Clinton said.
In a speech to the employees of the Internet firm UUNet in Virginia March 1, the President said: "Everything I have learned about human nature in my life, plus everything I have learned about China as President, convinces me that we're a lot better off bringing them into the family of nations into this common endeavor than shutting them out. Do we know what China will be like in 20 years? Of course we don't. We can't control what they do; all we can control is what we do. But here again, I think our values will be advanced, along with our economic interests, if we give people a chance to be good partners. If you don't give them a chance, it's almost certain that they will react in a negative way."
"I don't believe it's right to crack down on people for their religious views or their political expression or because they want to be in an association like the Falun Gong," the President said. "But I don't believe that we will have more influence on China by giving them the back of our hand instead of giving them a chance to build a different future."
Following is an excerpt from the White House transcript of the President's speech:
(begin excerpt)
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press SecretaryMarch 1, 2000
REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT TO UUNET AND MCI WORLDCOM EMPLOYEES
UUNet Technologies
Ashburn, Virginia3:15 P.M. EST
THE PRESIDENT: ... One of the things that we have worked hard on is to expand trade. Under Ambassador Barshefsky and her predecessor, we completed over 270 trade agreements. But in many ways, perhaps the most important of all is the agreement that -- or the decision Congress will have to make this year and in the next few months on whether to let China come into the World Trade Organization by giving them permanent, normal trading relation status with the United States.
If you've been following this debate at all, you know there is a lot of controversy about this in the Congress. And I won't go through all the arguments now, but let me just tell you, I can say this from my heart, you know, I'm not running for anything this year. (Laughter.) And most days it's okay with me, but I'm not -- most days. (Applause.)
But I care a lot about what this country will be like when the young people here in this audience are my age, when your children are your age. This is a profoundly important issue. It is, in the short term, the kind of decision that every country would wish for. Once in a generation you get a chance to open a market with over a billion consumers -- the biggest potential market in the world.
Let me explain, first of all, what this agreement does. In return for China's entry as a full partner in the World Trade Organization, the United States would gain unprecedented access to China's markets. Today, with the Chinese, we have our second-biggest trade deficit -- tens of billions of dollars, because our markets are open to their products, and they should be, because we'll be better off if they do better.
But their markets are not very open to our products and services. Under this agreement, Chinese tariffs in every sector, from telecommunications to automobiles to agriculture, will fall by half or more in five years. For the first time, our companies will be able to sell and distribute products in China made by workers here at home without transferring technology in manufacturing -- never happened before. For the first time, China will agree to play by the same open trading rules we do. Never happened before.
Meanwhile, we'll get two tough, new safeguards against surges of imports which would threaten to throw a lot of Americans out of work in a short time under unfair trade practices. So these are the kinds of changes any president, regardless of party, would welcome -- because presidents, regardless of party, have worked to bring about these changes for more than 30 years now.
This is a good deal for American workers, for American farmers, for American business. It's a good deal for America. But the only way we can get this agreement is for Congress to give China permanent, normal trading relations. This is one of the most important votes Congress will pass in this year and for many years to come. Next month, our Commerce Secretary, Bill Daley, and our Agriculture Secretary, Dan Glickman, are going on missions to China with dozens of members of Congress to meet with people in government and business and religious leaders who are interested in change in China.
It's very interesting to me that the more people go to China and spend time there, no matter what they do for a living or what their perspective is, the more likely they are to favor our bringing China into the world system of rule-based trade. Because this is about economics and more than economics -- and I want to say more about that in a minute.
But just think about the economics of high-tech companies. Today, China's tariffs on information technology products average 13 percent. When China joins the WTO, those tariffs will start to fall and be eliminated by 2005. China will open its Internet and its telecom markets to American investment and services for the first time. That's a huge deal.
Now, the magnitude of all this almost defies measurement. The number of Chinese Internet users -- let's just take that -- quadrupled in the last year alone, from 2 million to 9 million. This year the number will exceed 20 million. And you know what the internal dynamics of this technology are, you know how much your company has grown. Now, project that rate of growth onto a country that has over 1.2 billion people. And keep in mind, the United States is not being asked to do anything to get this agreement, except to treat them like a normal trading partner on a permanent basis and bring them into the WTO.
So what are we going to do? China doesn't have the information infrastructure to support 500 million Internet users yet. But UUNet already has a presence in Hong Kong. You could help them to build it. (Applause.)
Let's look at what happens if we didn't do it. Today we've got a huge advantage in high-tech trade internationally. What would happen if we didn't take advantage of this? China will grow anyway and someone else -- not you -- will reap the benefits of it. So if we turn our backs on this opportunity, we will be unilaterally disarming in perhaps the most vital area of our future economic growth.
And let me say, finally, this is about more than money. I saw a lot of you nodding when I said it was good morally and good economics to help lift the burden of debt from the poorest African countries if they're working to try to do better. I saw a lot of you nodding when I said it was the right thing to do to buy more from the Caribbean and Latin America countries if they were doing the right thing in opening their markets to us.
We have a decision to make here. The people who don't want to do this by and large think that China should not be taken into the World Trade Organization because we don't agree with all their political decisions. We don't like it when they repress human rights or political rights or religious expression. We don't agree with them that we should take little or no account of environmental impacts of economic decisions; or that we shouldn't take strong steps to eliminate child labor and slave labor and things like that. We have differences.
But think of this. You know how much the Internet has changed America. And we were already an open society. I can look out in this crowd and tell that many of you come from some place else. You know how much the Internet is changing where you came from and how much it could change if it were there. The same thing is true in China.
Everything I have learned about human nature in my life, plus everything I have learned about China as President, convinces me that we're a lot better off bringing them into the family of nations into this common endeavor than shutting them out. Do we know what China will be like in 20 years? Of course we don't. We can't control what they do; all we can control is what we do. But here again, I think our values will be advanced, along with our economic interests, if we give people a chance to be good partners. If you don't give them a chance, it's almost certain that they will react in a negative way.
So I ask all of you to think about this, because normally, Americans don't think about foreign policy much, but you know that with every passing day in a globalized economy, there is no longer a clear, bright line between an issue which is a domestic political issue and an issue which is a foreign policy issue.
With every passing day, these issues grow closer together. Do I like it when people's religious liberty is oppressed in China? No, I don't. But it's very interesting -- most of the evangelicals I know who have missions in China want China in the WTO because they know that that will make it more likely that there will be more freedom of expression, more contact with the outside world, and a bigger stake in working with other countries.
This is about money, yes; but it's about more than money. It's about whether we can create a world where there's the kind of harmony across race and ethnicity and religion that there must be in this work place that I can see just by looking around the room here. Wouldn't you like it if the world worked the way you do here? (Applause.) How could it be bad if companies like UUNet are able to make the tools of communications cheaper and better and more widely available to more Chinese people? It has to be good.
So I will say to you: I don't agree with everything the Chinese do. I'm sure they don't agree with everything I do. (Laughter.) And far be it for me to equate the two disagreements. (Laughter and applause.) I don't believe -- in all seriousness, I don't believe it's right to crack down on people for their religious views or their political expression or because they want to be in an association like the Falun Gong. I don't think that's right. But I don't believe that we will have more influence on China by giving them the back of our hand instead of giving them a chance to build a different future.
That's what this is about. And I want every one of you to think about this. Look, economically, this is a no-brainer. It's in your interest. It will make this company a lot more jobs. But I don't ask you as citizens to check your values at the door. Every one of us believes in some things that money can't buy.
But I'm telling you -- you just think about what you have learned in your life about human nature. The leaders of China are not foolish people, they're intelligent people. They know if they open these markets, they know if you go in there and everybody gets connected to the Internet that change is coming more rapidly in ways that you cannot control, and people will be able to define their future independent of the government's ability to control it more than ever before -- whether you're talking about religion or politics or personal life choices or anything else. They know that. And they have made this decision, and we cannot let our disagreements with government policy get in the way of our interest in a long-term partnership with the most populous country on Earth. So, again, I say, what is good economics is also consistent with our values.
The late Chief Justice Earl Warren once said that, "Liberty is the most contagious force in the world." I believe the Internet inevitably is an instrument of human liberty, and it will be in China as well if we continue to reach out to people. (Applause.)
So I'm asking you to do something if you agree with this. I want you to tell the members of Congress without regard to party that represent your state -- if you live here, if you live in Maryland, you live in West Virginia -- I want you to ask them to support this. And I want you to tell them, I want you to tell them that you will stay with them on this decision if they do, because this is very, very important.
You know, I'm grateful that since I've been President, America has done well. I'm grateful for the chance I've had to make a contribution to it. But, frankly, I'm much more interested in whether America continues to do well long after my tenure in office. And, again, I say to you, if you know in your business that if you want to keep doing well, you always have to keep trying to do better; and looking at the future, anticipating the changes, imagining how you want it to be.
I can't imagine a world that I want for my child and my grandchildren that doesn't include partnerships that are constructive with the big countries of the world which promote human liberty, as well as economic progress. That's what this whole thing is about.
So I say to you, I came here today because you are the symbol of 21st century America. You are the embodiment of what I want for the future. (Applause.) And because of what you do for a living every day, because of how you see and feel the way the world is changing and how you see what it can become, you are in a position that most of your fellow Americans are not in to understand the importance of this. So, again, I say to you: you're doing great. I want you to do better. And I think we can do better and do good, but we have to start this year by making sure that we don't turn away from this profoundly important opportunity.
Thank you very much. (Applause.)
(end excerpt)
(Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: usinfo.state.gov)
Return to The United States and China.Return to IIP Home Page.