G L O B A L I S S U E S Climate Change Choices THE NEXT STEPS
Kathleen McGinty
(Excerpts of remarks made February 4, 1998, before the U.S. House of Representatives Science
Committee.)
THE KYOTO PROTOCOL
Although the agreement reached in Kyoto will not reverse the build-up of greenhouse gases in
the atmosphere, it will begin slowing the rate of increase. Equally important, it puts in place a
solid foundation upon which the global marketplace can increasingly be engaged in reducing
greenhouse gas emissions. The agreement draws heavily from the proposals advanced by the
United States.
In October of last year, President Clinton outlined a number of elements critical to achieving an
effective agreement. He underscored that any agreement had to contain: 1) realistic
medium-term, legally binding targets for developed countries; 2) flexible, market-based
implementation mechanisms; and 3) measures to secure the meaningful participation of key
developing countries.
I am pleased to report that we fully achieved our first two objectives, and through the innovative
Clean Development Mechanism made a down payment on the third. Next steps must include
further work on operational details of international emissions trading, compliance mechanisms,
and developing country participation.
The president has made it clear that he does not intend to send the Kyoto Protocol to the Senate
for ratification until we have achieved meaningful participation by key developing countries.
NEXT STEPS -- INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITY
While the Kyoto agreement secures major elements that the United States sought to ensure such
as flexible, market-based mechanisms for addressing concerns about global warming, future
negotiations will still need to address several important issues. The parties now move forward
with working group meetings scheduled for June and the next meeting of the parties to the
climate convention scheduled for November in Buenos Aires. Issues that will be addressed at
that and subsequent meetings include the following:
NEXT STEPS -- DOMESTIC ACTIONS
In his State of the Union message, the president described his proposed tax cut and technology
initiative aimed at jump-starting efforts to enhance our nation's energy efficiency and economic
competitiveness. This program was laid out in detail in the president's budget.
It targeted $6,300 million over the next five years to provide incentives for our industry,
businesses, and consumers to make and purchase more energy efficient products. It challenges
the innovative abilities of the private sector and helps ensure that those firms that succeed in
developing energy saving products will have a substantial market in which to sell those products.
For consumers, it provides a double bonus. First, it helps reduce the initial costs of purchasing
energy saving products. Second, throughout the lifetime of the product, consumers will benefit
from reduced energy costs.
The president's 1999 budget includes $3,600 million over five years in tax credits aimed at
encouraging broader use of existing energy saving technologies and spurring further innovations.
It also includes $2,700 million in new research and development investments to ensure that
innovative greenhouse gas reducing products continue to flow through the pipeline and into the
marketplace in the coming years.
Examples of specific provisions contained in the president's budget include the following:
These budget proposals implement one of the key commitments made by the president in his
October 22nd speech at the National Geographic Society. In that speech the president also
pledged that the federal government, as the largest user of energy, would take the lead in
enhancing our efforts at improving energy efficiency; that we would work closely with the
private sector in developing voluntary programs to reduce emissions; that we would grant early
credit for reductions that occur prior to a binding target; and that we would help shape utility
restructuring in ways that contribute to reductions in greenhouse gas reductions. We are working
today to make all of these commitments real.
Beyond the president's budget proposals, a number of encouraging developments have taken
place in both the public and private sectors in the short time since Kyoto. Let me briefly mention
four of them.
These technological advances were made possible through the efforts of the Partnership for a
New Generation of Vehicles between the administration, U.S. auto companies, and their
suppliers.
Compressed Air Challenge: Air compressors represent about 3 percent of total industrial
electricity use and one percent of total U.S. electricity consumption. In mid-January, the
Department of Energy (DOE) and major equipment manufacturers announced a new agreement
aimed at significantly enhancing efficiency in this sector.
Under the agreement, changes in equipment and operating practices are anticipated to reduce
energy use in this category by 10 percent by 2010 at a cost savings of $150 million per year
while reducing greenhouse gases by 700,000 metric tons of carbon.
VCR/TV Energy Star Program: TV and VCRs represent one of the fastest growing sources of
electricity demand. Consumers spend over $1,000 million annually to power VCRs and TVs that
are switched off. In early January the vice president announced a pathbreaking partnership
between the Environmental Protection Agency and the major manufacturers of these electronic
goods.
The program is quite ambitious with a goal of achieving up to a 70-percent-reduction in energy
use when the equipment is turned off without sacrificing product quality, utility, or increasing
costs. The average household could cut its energy bills by 30 percent or $400 per year by
switching to the full line of Energy Star products.
These examples further underscore the potential for energy and cost saving opportunities to
reduce our emissions of greenhouse gases. In sum, the Kyoto Protocol represents a significant
diplomatic achievement for the United States and a key contribution to the critical effort to
safeguard our children from the effects of potentially severe climatic disruption. At the same
time, this effort is a work in progress.
Much remains to be done if we are fully to seize the environmental and economic benefits of
action on this pressing issue.
|