’’’’’’斯’’爾曼
(CHARLOTTE PERKINS GILMAN)
婦’’’濟 Women and Economics
’’’’’’’’’’’’望’除’之’’還有’’及’天’之樂’個’’’’’情’趣’’’醬’等等’’個’’’獲’’’切’’接’那’’’’戒’’嫁給’’’ ’’’’’斯’’爾曼(1860－l 935)’’’’’’’婦’’動’著’’論’’’爾曼’童’’分’’’’親’棄母親’’’裏’’’’’’’1884’’’爾曼結’’’’生有’’’’務’’瑣’’煩’’’精’’潰’1888’’’’著’’離’’夫’離’’’’原’’夫’’’’’摯友’’’’’’爾曼’’’’’’們’’由’騰’’間’’著’’’講’’爾曼’有’’’說’詩’’’’’’有關婦’’勞’’’’組織等’目’’講’維’生’’ 1900’’’爾曼’’’’’’’續’’講’著’’’忙生’’’1909’’19l6’’’爾曼隻身 ’’’輯’’’’’’動月報’’’’’’’’’’’撰’’’爾曼還’’’’部’’’’’’’說’’及’部有關’’精’’潰’虛’’著’’’黃’’’牆’’’ ’裏選載’’’’’’’婦’’’濟’(1898)’文章倡導’’婦’’’濟’立’ 我們’’做’’比’’’’給我們’’’’’’’’婦’’’’’由’’’有’話’’’比’’’由少’’’’們’’’’’條’’’窗戶’視’們生’’’中’’’’角’’’’’閨’幔間隙中’’’’’’部’’’’們豎’耳朵’’饑’渴’聽’’’’’’’中傳’’’’’’識’莎’’奧瑟羅’中’’絲’’’’’夫奧瑟羅’中’’解’’’’’’’’’’’’’解’’情’’’’’’’’’’雖’’有不’’’’創’欲’有’’’毅’’’’’式’’’’精’’’’有’’’’’婦’’’’方面’完’’限’’’’們’’像’’那樣操勞’’那’最原’’’務’’當’們’’’’’’種辛勤勞’’’’職’’次’’我們’’’’’’們’’’’婦’’雙手’體’’’’接’’’’務’’’’獲’’’允’’’’’’’’’’!除’之’’婦’’’’’’’’不允’’’婦’’勞動不僅’內’’’限’’’’式’’’樣’’’’’’’允’’們’’做那’’們’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’最原’’手’勞動’’ 婦’’’’’’累月’成’綜’’’’’溯’’’’’’’’’’’心’首’’’’’’’對’有生’’巨’’’’’樣’用 ’婦’身’’’次’’緊’’’’之’’’之’成’種’’’’’風’習’’’’’’之’化’’’’’化’’中’婦’’’’’’’’’’’’’接著’’著文’’’’累’而成’’’不’’’個個’’’不’’’’教’’用’之’’’’’’’’腦’’藝’’之’’’’教’之’’’習’’之’’’’’’有’’最’’本’’濟需’’它奠’’整個’’結’’基礎’’’用’’’今’’’永遠’’’疑問’’’種種’對婦’’有’’’’條件’ 對婦’’’’’’本’’’’’有’’而’’’’少’’’’有個重’’’還’考’’那’’’天遺傳’’“’’’’”’’據’’’’’’’日’’族’日爾曼部族裏’婦’不’’’’’’而’’日’國’’’不准’’’’’’由’遺傳’’用’’個’’’’親身’’’有’’’’’’’’’圖’’’’’傾’’而’個’’’樣’母親身’’’有’’’’’溫’天’’’天遺傳’’用’’’’天環境及教’傾’’區’對’’趨’平等’遺傳’’用’’揚’’’抑’’’’’’’不讓’’成’’種’’蛾’’給那’’圖’Ｔ’’’個種族裏’’種’’落’’’’種’’’’’’’’’不讓’們’’圖’’’’’遺傳’’種’用’’’類生’異’’’’極’’難’’種’’’’難應’我們早’’’’我們’生’’’正’’’個’’誕生’’’’’’親參’’種族’動’’禮’’’’’化’’’’’身’傳統’’’’’’重’’’化’’樣’’重’生’’’’親身’次體驗那種’限’’’壓抑’’’’’’’’’’’窒’’’個“不”’’’’’’’’個’’’有’望’’有創’’探’’學習及’’個’見解’奮’’’’’望’’ 對’個面對生’’’輕’’’說’’’’個’闊’天’’’’’’用’而’必須’用身’’’有’’’假’第’’選擇錯’’’’’選擇’選擇’’條路’不’’’’’選擇’’條路’最’獲’成’’整個’類’種不’’’’需’’’’’’’種有’’身’’’’’’’成’什麼樣’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’什麼’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’望’’’’什麼’’都’’’’’’’ 對’個面對生’’’’’說’’部’’’’’樣’’’身’’樣擁有’’’’’’’’望’’’’’’’而’’望’’’’’望’’’’都’有’次’選擇’’’’面’’’有’條’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’望’除’之’’還有’’及’天’之樂’個’’’’’情’趣’’’醬’等等’’個’’’獲’’’切’’’接’那’’’’戒’’嫁給’’’壓’之’概莫’’’’’’身’傳統累’而成’壓’’’’’圍環境’續’’’壓’’’種壓’’’教’’潛移’化’’’’內心’’’最’’’竟’’’’’種壓’’’’’議’’’’’’’變本’’’’’給’’’’’’’樣’’’’’’’化還有什麼’值’’’’’?’不’不’’’’’身’’’有’種’有’’’’’’我們早’都成’’’雌蜂’’’而’’個’’’’個’’’’’’’Ⅸ’’’’藝’’’’’’’’’’’’’巨商’’’’’身體’腦’’方面’都’’’分’有’輩’’’成’’’’’儘管’’’’化’’們’’’’’’少’’’化’’ What we do modifies us more than what is done to us. The freedom of expression has been more restricted in women than the freedom of impression, if that be possible. Something of the world she lived in she has seen from her barred windows. Some air has come through the purdah's folds, some knowledge has filtered to her eager ears from the talk of men. Desdemona learned somewhat of Othello. Had she known more, she might have lived longer. But in the ever-growing human impulse to create, the power and will to make, to do, to express one's new spirit in new forms,―here she has been utterly debarred. She might work as she had worked from the beginning,―at the primitive labors of the household; but in the inevitable expansion of even those industries to professional levels we have striven to hold her back. To work with her own hands, for nothing, in direct body-service to her own family,―this has been permitted,―yes, compelled. But to be and to do anything further from this she has been forbidden. Her labor has not been limited in land. but in degree. Whatever she has been allowed to do must be done in private and alone, die first-hand industries of savage times. . . . It is painfully interesting to trace the gradual cumulative effect of these conditions upon women: first, the action of large natural laws, acting on her as they would act on any other animal; then the evolution of social customs and laws (with her position as the active cause), following the direction of mere physical forces, and adding heavily to them; then, with increasing civilization, the unbroken accumulation of precedent, burnt into each generation by the growing force of education, made lovely by art, holy by religion, desirable by habit; and, steadily acting from beneath, the unswerving pressure of economic necessity upon which the whole structure rested. These are strong modifying conditions, indeed. The process would have been even more effective and far less painful but for one important circumstance. Heredity has no Salic law. Each girl child inherits from her father a certain increasing percentage of human development, human power, human tendency; and each boy as well inherits from his mother the increasing percentage of sex-development, sex-power, sextendency. The action of heredity has been to equalize what every tendency of environment and education made to differ. This has saved us from such a female as the gypsy moth. It has held up the woman, and held down the man. It has set iron bounds to our absurd effort to make a race with one sex a million years behind the other. But it has added terribly to the pain and difficulty of human life,―a difficulty and a pain that should have taught us long since that we were living on wrong lines. Each woman born, re-humanized by the current of race activity carried on by her father and re-womanized by her traditional position, has had to live over again in her own person the same process of restriction, repression, denial; the smothering "no" which crushed down all her human desires to create, to discover, to learn, to express, to advance. . . . To the young man confronting life the world lies wide. Such powers as he has he may use, must use. If he chooses wrong at first, he may choose again, and yet again. Not effective or successful in one channel, he may do better in another. The growing, varied needs of all mankind call on him for the varied service in which he finds his growth. What he wants to be, he may strive to get. What he wants to get, he may strive to get. Wealth, power, social distinction, fame, ―what he wants he can try for. To the young woman confronting life there is the same world beyond, there are the same human energies and human desires and ambition within. But all that she may wish to have, all that she may wish to do, must come through a single channel and a single choice. Wealth, power, social distinction, fame,―not only these, but home and happiness, reputation, ease and pleasure, her bread and butter,―all, must come to her through a small gold ring. This is a heavy pressure. It has accumulated behind her through heredity, and continued about her through environment. It has been subtly trained into her through education, till she herself has come to think it a right condition, and pours its influence upon her daughter with increasing impetus. Is it any wonder that women are oversexed? But for the constant inheritance from the more human male, we should have been queen bees, indeed, long before this. But the daughter of the soldier and the sailor, of the artist, the inventor, the great merchant, has inherited in body and brain her share of his development in each generation, and so stayed somewhat human for all her femininity. . . . ’ ’ |