弗’’�堙式式式式朽�
(FREDERICK DOUGLASS)


’羅切斯’’’立日’說
Independence Day Speech at Rochester

Executive Committee of the Philadelphia Anti-Slavery Society

’’反奴隸學’之執’’Ⅸ’’1851

’

公民’’們’對不’’請允’我問’’’爲什麽今天’我’’�堙成�?’們’國’’立’我’及我’’’’’們有’’’?’們’7月4日對’國黑奴有’’’?


弗’’�堙式式式式朽�(1817’1895)’’’傑’’’說’’’’’’’’’’’’’’動’’’’奴’動中’’’個巨’’’’’’’生爲奴隸’’未見’生身’母’’’馬里蘭’’’個種植園中由’母’’’’’歲’’’’’巴爾’摩當’奴’’巴爾’摩’’’’教’讀’’雖’’’’’’止’’’’’’歲’’’’’市’麻塞諸塞’’貝’福’’’那�堙式式式式式忖顜�爲’’’斯(原’’貝’)’

1841’’’’邀請’’’’’’反奴隸’集’’’說’’雄’’’’’’折’’’麻塞諸塞’反奴隸’’’爲’’’’’成’’’傑’’’說’’有’評論’對’’’實’身’示’疑’’對’’’’1845’’’’傳’’’’’斯爲’避’’’’’’’’奴而’’’’’’國’’’’’’’’’說’’國’’掙’足夠’錢贖身爲’由’’’’1847’’’’’羅切斯’創辦’’’’’奴報’’’’極’’報’

’1841’’’’’’斯成’’國最著’’黑’’奴’’’’1852’’’邀請’羅切斯’’’國’立’’日集’’’講’’言’’’’照老’’’’’’國’國元勳們衆’’’’’’’’’’說中’’’話’’轉’提醒聽衆說’國黑’’有’’’立’由’’見’個國’’虛僞’聽衆’’’驚’


公民’’們’對不’’請允’我問’’’爲什麽今天’我’’�堙成�?’們’國’’立’我’及我’’’’’們有’’’?那個’’立’言’�堙汍憿式式式式戎恁忖恁忖翩式旭間早魽式式戎峞戍畯抾�?’’’我’’’’’’�堙式旭瞗式曳蝨癒式式戍畯怴忖ㄗ活式汛諢式式式式式式戎恁式早怴式戎蔇蝥痋戍畯怞荂戍琚式汐臏癒式式池飽朱�?

爲’’們’爲’我們’’’’’’’聽’對’’問’’’’’答’’’’’樣’我’任務’’’’’身’’擔’’’’’輕’’快’’有誰’’’’石心’’’’’個國’’慰問都不’’之’動?有誰’’’’’不化’’’’’之心而不’謝’’’’’’’價’’’’’’有誰’’’’’’’’’’’’手’’奴’’鎖鏈’解’’都不’’嗓’高唱’個國’’樂’’’’路’’’我不’那樣’’’’’樣’情’’’啞巴都’’’雄’’”’’’像鹿’’’’”’’’

’情’’’’’’我’麽說’’’爲我’切’’’’我們之間有著’異’今天輝煌’’’盛’’把我們排斥’’’’’們’’’’立僅僅’’我們之間’有不’’’’’溝’’’’有’都’’’’’們爲之高’’唱’種種’福’’們分’’’’們’’輩’’’正’’’由’’’’’立’豐’遺産’而我’’有’陽’’給’們’’’撫慰’’給我們’’’’痕’’’’7月4日屬’’們’而不屬’我’’們’’’雀’’而我’’傷心’歎’’’個身著’’’’’’’由’雄偉’輝’’殿’’’’’們’’高唱’樂’’’’不啻’’’’’’’’’褻’’’’諷’’公民們’’們’’’爲’’’我’請我’言’’’’’樣’’們’’’’’’爲’食’’’’我’警’’們’不’ 覆蹈’樣’個國’’’轍’’那�堙式式式式式式汝菕式式早荌瞗式戎ョ朵吨恁式式朱匟虷荂式式式戎獺式�爲’’’今天’我’把’個皮肉’剝’飽’’難’民族’’歎之’傳’給’們’

“’巴比’’之濱’我們落坐’’啊’’’錫’’’我們Z’著’我們把我們’豎’’掛’’樹’’’爲’’’’’’我們’爲’虜’’’我們唱’支’’蹂’我們’’’我們’’’’’’們說’唱’支錫’’’’’’’我們’’’’塊陌生’’’’唱’’’’’’’’噢’’路’’’’’我竟忘掉’’’讓我’’手癱瘓’’’’我忘掉’’’’讓我’’’粘’’’頂’’”

公民’’們’’’們’國喧囂’’樂’中’我聽’成百’’’’’’號’’們身’’鎖鏈’’日’’’重難忍’’而今日’’們’’樂’’’’們’’’’’難熬’’’我’’忘’’’’’我不’切切’’那’今日’’’著’’’’’們’那麽’“’讓我’’手癱瘓’’’讓我’’’粘’’’頂’’”’’忘’’們’’’對’們’’’’’’’’’’還’’’衆’’塊’’鳴唱’’’異’最’’’最’’聽’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’面’’盡譴’’’’’公民’’們’我’言’’’’’國’奴隸’’我’’奴隸’角’’’’今日’’’’及它對公衆’’’’我身’’國黑奴’’們’’’’’我’’’’我’’’’整個心’’’不’豫’’’’’我’’’今天’個7月4日�堙式早荌瞗式朱癒式式式式式式汍耤式式戎憎ㄐ式式式朴菕忖ˊ蚹畯怴式式式旭瞗忖憿式式式汐晼朱吇央忖竣憿江旍央戎式式式式�爲都’樣顯’’聽’’’’’嘔’’國對’’’虛僞’’對’’’’虛僞’’對未’’’’虛僞’’’’’’我’’’’’’體鱗傷’’’’’’黑奴’邊’’’’ 凌’’’’之’’’’身著桎梏’’由之’’’’’’’棄’踐踏’’憲’’’’’’’之’’’’身而’’盡我’備’’有’’’對’切’奴隸’’’’重’’’’’國’’’’’永’永’’’圖’’我’抗議’’’我’譴’’“我不’’’辭’我不’’’’”’我’用’’我最’’’言辭’而任’’’’不’偏見’’蔽’’’任’內心�堣ㄐ式汛禰ㄐ朱癒式式式有ㄐ式式戍睇﹛式式次亶ㄐ戎縑式式忖翩式式�

’而’我’’’我’有’聽衆’說’“正’’’’’’’’’奴’’’’們’給公衆’’’’’’’’’們’’說’少’難’’’戒’斥’’們’’成’’’望’’’’’’”’’’我’爲’當’切都顯而’見’’說什麽’’’’’’’’’關’反奴隸’’綱領’們’我說’’’’’’’個問’’’’個’’’我們’國民還需’’撥’’我還須著手證’奴隸’’’嗎’’’’屬公’’’’有’’疑’奴隸’們’實’’們’’’’’’都’’’’’’’當’們’’奴隸們’反抗’’’’’’’’’維’尼’’’’’’’項’’’’黑’ (’論’’麽不’情) 犯’’中任’’項都’’’極’’而’中’有’項’’’’個白’’’’樣’’’’不正說’’奴隸’有’’’有’智’有’任’’嗎’奴隸’有’’’’’屬公’’’實證’’奴隸’’’’’方’’’條’都’’’止教’奴隸讀’’’’’’’’’高’’款’’’’’’’假’’們’’’有誰曾對田’’’’馬’’’’’樣’’’’那麽’’我’’’’論奴隸’’有’’’假’街’’’’’’中’飛鳥’’’’’羊’’�堙式成丑式式式式汕帠ㄓ擦諵ㄐ戎�隸’野’’區’’那麽我’’’們’論奴隸’不’’’’

’’’’’’’’’黑’’種’樣’備’’’’足夠’’我們’’’種植’收獲’我們’用’種器械’’’’’’’橋’’船’我們’用’種’屬’銅’’’’’銀’ 我們讀’’’’’’算’我們當職Ⅸ’商’’’’’我們中間有’’’醫生’’’’詩’’’’’’輯’’說’’教’’我們’’’’’’’’’’切’動’’’’福尼’’’採’’’太平’�堙式式有翩式式式式式式式戌洁戍畯怚矷朴菕式戌ㄤ菕式旭妗菕式戌珛菕式此熊菕式式忖之畯怴式忖牷式式式式式式有怑哄式式式戍畯怴式式式式旭繴�教’’’’期’’’’’福永生’而’’情’’’還’我們證’我們’’’’不今’驚’’分’

難’’們’我證’’有’由’’’’證’’’’身’正當’’?’們早’’’’’’’我還須證’奴隸’’邪’嗎?’對’’’’’們還’個問’嗎?’個問’竟’’’難’需’推’’’’原’’’’’’’樣’奧難解’’’’’’邏輯分’’’論嗎?當著’國’’面’我’’’’言中對’問’條分’’’’’對’實證’’’’’’’’證’’生’’有’由’那麽我’給’們’什麽’’’?’樣做我’顯’’T’’’’’對’們’’解’’不’不’’’天’’’’’不曉奴隸’對’’不公正’’

’’變爲野’’剝奪’們’’由’’’們勞’’獲’’’們對’’’’’’關’’’’’’對’們棍棒交’’用皮’’打’們’肉體’’’們’’’鎖’’’’’著’’ ’’’們’把’們’賣’集市’讓’們’離’散’’’’們’’齒’’’’們’皮膚’用饑’迫’’們聽話而’’’’’’’還用’著我’證’’’切都’不公正’嗎?我還須證’’個’’ 污’’’’’邪’’嗎?不’我不’’我’’間’精’’’’’值’’’’情’’而不’用’’’’證’

那麽’還剩’什麽需’論證’?’證’奴隸’不’天’’’’’’有’立它嗎?’證’我們’’學博’們’錯’嗎?’樣’本身’’褻’’’’’’’’不’’天’!有誰’夠’’爲’’’論證?那’’做’’’’’’’’’’樣做’’我不’’’’’不’’’論證’’候’’

今日’’’需’’’’熱’鋼’’而’今’’’’論證’啊’’’我有’’’’’’我’讓’國都聽’我’’’’今天我’’’’’巨’之勢’’我’’’情’’’’’’’切’譴’’’’’朽’諷’’’’俱’’’斥’’爲我們需’’不’’’’而’’’’我們需’’不’’風細’’而’’’’鳴’我們’風暴’’ 颶風’’’’’國’’’情必須’’’國’’’’必須喚醒’國’’溫’必須打’’國’’虛僞必須揭’’它對’’’’類犯’’’’必須公之’衆’’’’’’擊’

’們’7月4日對’國黑奴有’’’?我’’答’’’’之中’’有’’天比今日’’’們’’讓’’’’不’’爲犧’’’那種滔天’不公’殘忍’’對’們’說’’們’’’’欺’之’’’們鼓’’’由’’’’褻’’’們’國’’偉’’虛’’’誇’’們’喜’’’’’虛’’情’’’們對暴’’譴’’不’’’’顔’’’’們’由平等’’’’’’’’’’’’’們’’禱’’’詩’’們’’’’’’’’’’有’’教’’’儀式’不’’面對’’’裝腔’’’虛假欺’’不’’褻’’虛僞’做’’’不’’’野’’都’’’羞’’’’’覆’’’’薄薄’’’’’’’’’’’’還’有任’’個野’民族’’有任’’個’’民族’像’國’那樣犯’’’’’’聽’’’’’’’’’勾當’

不論’們走’’裡’不論’們’’裡’’’’’舊’陸’’有’’國’’’國’’踏’整個’’’’收集’有殘忍’’錄’’’盡’’’把’們’調’結’’’國’天’生’’’個比較’’們’’’我’樣’’結論’’’’’’’野’’’顔’’’僞善方面’’國’’’’’’雙’’


Independence Day Speech at Rochester

Fellow citizens, pardon me, allow me to ask, why am I called upon to speak here today? What have I, or those I represent, to do with your national independence? Are the great principles of political freedom and of natural justice, embodied in that Declaration of Independence, extended to us? and am I, therefore, called upon to bring our humble offering to the national altar, and to confess the benefits and express devout gratitude for the blessings resulting from your independence to us?

    Would to God, both for your sakes and ours, that an affirmative answer could be truthfully returned to these questions! Then would my task be light, and my burden easy and delightful. For who is there so cold that a nation's sympathy could not warm him? Who so obdurate and dead to the claims of gratitude that would not thankfully acknowledge such priceless benefits? Who so stolid and selfish that would not give his voice to swell the hallelujahs of a nation's jubilee, when the chains of servitude had been torn from his limbs? I am not that man. In a case like that the dumb might eloquently speak and the “lame man leap as an hart.”

    But such is not the state of the case. I say it with a sad sense of the disparity between us. I am not included within the pale of this glorious anniversary! Your high independence only reveals the immeasurable distance between us. The blessings in which you, this day, rejoice are not enjoyed in common. The rich inheritance of justice, liberty, prosperity, and independence bequeathed by your fathers is shared by you, not by me. The sunlight that brought light and healing to you has brought stripes and death to me. This Fourth of July is yours, not mine. You may rejoice, I must mourn. To drag a man in fetters into the grand illuminated temple of liberty, and call upon him to join you in joyous anthems, were inhuman mockery and sacrilegious irony. Do you mean, citizens, to mock me by asking me to speak today? If so, there is a parallel to your conduct. And let me warn you that it is dangerous to copy the example of a nation whose crimes, towering up to heaven, were thrown down by the breath of the Almighty, burying that nation in irrevocable ruin! I can today take up the plaintive lament of a peeled and woe-smitten people!

    "By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down. Yea! we wept when we remembered Zion. We hanged our harps upon the willows in the midst thereof. For there, they that carried us away captive, required of us a song; and they who wasted us required of us mirth, saying, Sing us one of the songs of Zion. How can -we sing the Lord's song in a strange land? If I forget thee, 0 Jerusalem, let my right hand forget her cunning. If I do not remember thee, let my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth."

    Fellow citizens, above your national, tumultuous joy, I hear the mournful wail of millions! whose chains, heavy and grievous yesterday, are, today, rendered more intolerable by the jubilee shouts that reach them. If I do forget, if I do not faithfully remember those bleeding children of sorrow this day, "may my right hand forget her cunning, and may my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth"! To forget them, to pass lightly over their wrongs, and to chime in with the popular theme would be treason most scandalous and shocking, and would make me a reproach before God and the world. My subject, then, fellow citizens, is American slavery. I shall see this day and its popular characteristics from the slave's point of view. Standing there identified with the American bondman, making his wrongs mine. I do not hesitate to declare with all my soul that the character and conduct of this nation never looked blacker to me than on this Fourth of July! Whether we turn to the declarations of the past or to the professions of the present, the conduct of the nation seems equally hideous and revolting. America is false to the past, false to the present, and solemnly binds herself to be false to the future. Standing with God and the crushed and bleeding slave on this occasion, I will, in the name of humanity which is outraged, in the name of liberty which is fettered, in the name of the Constitution and the Bible which are disregarded and trampled upon, dare to call in question and to denounce, with all the emphasis I can command, everything that serves to perpetuate slavery--the great sin and shame of America! "I will not equivocate, I will not excuse"; I will use the severest language I can command; and yet not one word shall escape me that any man, whose judgment is not blinded by prejudice, or who is not at heart a slaveholder, shall not confess to be right and just.

   But I fancy I hear someone of my audience say. "It is just in this circumstance that you and your brother abolitionists fail to make a favorable impression on the public mind. Would you argue more and denounce less, would you persuade more and rebuke less, your cause would be much more likely to succeed." But, I submit, where all is plain, there is nothing to be argued. What point in the antislavery creed would you have me argue? On what branch of the subject do the people of this country need light? Must I undertake to prove that the slave is a man? That point is conceded already. Nobody doubts it. The slaveholders themselves acknowledge it in the enactment of laws for their government. They acknowledge it when they punish disobedience on the part of the slave. There are seventy-two crimes in the state of Virginia which, if committed by a black man (no matter how ignorant he be), subject him to the punishment of death; while only two of the same crimes will subject a white man to the like punishment. What is this but the acknowledgment that the slave is a moral, intellectual, and responsible being? The manhood of the slave is conceded. It is admitted in the fact that the Southern statute books are covered with enactments forbidding, under severe fines and penalties, the teaching of the slave to read or to write. When you can point to any such laws in reference to the beasts of the field, then I may consent to argue the manhood of the slave. When the dogs in your streets, when the fowls of the air, when the cattle on your hills, when the fish of the sea and the reptiles that crawl shall be unable to distinguish the slave from a brute, then will I argue with you that the slave is a man!

    For the present, it is enough to affirm the equal manhood of the Negro race. Is it not astonishing that, while we are plowing, planting, and reaping, using all kinds of mechanical tools, erecting houses, constructing bridges, building ships, working in metals of brass, iron, copper, silver, and gold; that, while we are reading, writing, and ciphering, acting as clerks, merchants, and secretaries, having among us lawyers, doctors, ministers, poets, authors, editors, orators, and teachers; that, while we are engaged in all manner of enterprises common to other men, digging gold in California, capturing the whale in the Pacific, feeding sheep and cattle on the hillside, living, moving, acting, thinking, planning, living in families as husbands, wives, and children, and, above all, confessing and worshiping the Christian's God, and looking hopefully for life and immortality beyond the grave, we are called upon to prove that we are men!

    Would you have me argue that man is entitled to liberty? That he is the rightful owner of his own body? You have already declared it. Must I argue the wrongfulness of slavery? Is that a question for republicans? Is it to be settled by the rules of logic and argumentation, as a matter beset with great difficulty, involving a doubtful application of the principle of justice, hard to be understood? How should I look today, in the presence of Americans, dividing and subdividing a discourse, to show that men have a natural right to freedom? speaking of it relatively and positively, negatively and affirmatively? To do so would be to make myself ridiculous and to offer an insult to your understanding. There is not a man beneath the canopy of heaven that does not know that slavery is wrong for him.

    What, am I to argue that it is wrong to make men brutes, to rob them of their liberty, to work them without wages, to keep them ignorant of their relations to their fellow men, to beat them with sticks, to flay their flesh with the lash, to load their limbs with irons, to hunt them with dogs, to sell them at auction, to sunder their families, to knock out their teeth, to burn their flesh, to starve them into obedience and submission to their masters? Must I argue that a system thus marked with blood, and stained with pollution, is wrong? No! I will not. I have better employment for my time and strength than such arguments would imply.

    What, then, remains to be argued? Is it that slavery is not divine; that God did not establish it; that our doctors of divinity are mistaken? There is blasphemy in the thought. That which is inhuman cannot be divine! Who can reason on such a proposition? They that can may; I cannot. The time for such argument is past.

   At a time like this, scorching iron, not convincing argument, is needed. O! had I the ability, and could I reach the nation's ear, I would today pour out a fiery stream of biting ridicule, blasting reproach, withering sarcasm, and stern rebuke. For it is not light that is needed, but fire; it is not the gentle shower, but thunder. We need the storm, the whirlwind, and the earthquake. The feeling of the nation must be quickened; the conscience of the nation must be roused; the propriety of the nation must be startled; the hypocrisy of the nation must be exposed; and its crimes against God and man must be proclaimed and denounced.

    What, to the American slave, is your Fourth of July? I answer: a day that reveals to him, more than all other days in the year, the gross injustice and cruelty to which he is the constant victim. To him, your celebration is a sham; your boasted liberty, an unholy license; your national greatness, swelling vanity; your sounds of rejoicing are empty and heartless; your denunciation of tyrants, brass-fronted impudence; your shouts of liberty and equality, hollow mockery; your prayers and hymns, your sermons and thanksgivings, with all your religious parade and solemnity, are, to Him, mere bombast, fraud, deception, impiety, and hypocrisy--a thin veil to cover up crimes which would disgrace a nation of savages. There is not a nation of savages. There is not a nation on the earth guilty of practices more shocking and bloody than are the people of the United States at this very hour.

    Go where you may, search where you will, roam through all the monarchies and despotisms of the Old World, travel through South America, search out every abuse, and when you have found the last, lay your facts by the side of the everyday practices of this nation, and you will say with me that, for revolting barbarity and shameless hypocrisy, America reigns without a rival.

’

’