I. GENERAL PRINCIPLES
A. The principle of germaneness was
adopted as a rule of the House in 1789. (Rule XVI, cl.7)
B. The rule is based on the notion
that the House should only consider one subject matter at a time.
Its purpose is to provide an orderly procedure and to expedite
the business of the House.
C. The rule of germaneness applies
to an amendment and its relationship to a bill or a pending amendment.
It does not apply to the relationship between two provisions of
the bill itself.
D. The burden of proof rests on the
amendment's proponent.
E. If a portion of an amendment is
not germane, the entire amendment will be ruled out of order.
F. An amendment to strike is germane
unless it would change the scope of the bill. For example, an
amendment striking an exclusion is not germane if it would expand
the scope of coverage of the bill to a class not already covered.
G. Germaneness is a technical body
of law -- it is not necessarily the same as "relevancy."
An amendment may be politically related to a proposition in a
bill, but may not be germane. The effect is to preclude many amendments
and to give an advantage to the proponents of the bill as drafted.
H. If an amendment is ruled not germane,
it is often possible to redraft it to correct the problems. Consult
with the Parliamentarian and Legislative Counsel to redraft amendments
accordingly.
II. PROPOSITION TO WHICH AN AMENDMENT
MUST BE GERMANE
A. An amendment must be germane to
the particular paragraph or section to which it is offered.
B. An amendment adding a new section
to the bill must be germane to the portion of the bill to which
it is offered. Thus, if offered to title II of the bill, it must
be germane to title II (and not necessarily germane just to the
preceding section).
C. Germaneness is determined based
on the portion of the bill that has been read at the time the
amendment is offered; an amendment that may be germane at the
end of the reading of the bill may not be germane earlier. Thus,
if the bill is being read for amendment by title, a new section
must be germane to that particular title; but if the bill is considered
as read and open to amendment at any point, the amendment need
only be germane to the bill as a whole and not to a particular
title.
D. In a multi-title bill, an amendment
adding a new title must be germane to the bill as a whole.
Germaneness, page 2
E. An amendment must be germane to
the bill in its current form, i.e., it must be germane to the
bill as modified by amendments previously adopted.
F. 1. A second degree amendment
must be germane to the first degree amendment
2. A substitute for a pending amendment must be germane to the amendment, not the
underlying text
G. Instructions in a motion to recommit
must be germane to the subject matter of the bill as a whole,
even though the instructions do not propose a direct amendment
to the bill.
III. TESTS OF GERMANENESS
In determining which of the tests to apply, the Chair first determines the nature and scope of the proposition being amended and then the relationship of the amendment being offered to the text.
An amendment which fails any one of
the following tests will be ruled not germane.
A. SUBJECT MATTER
1. An amendment must relate to the
subject matter under consideration.
Examples:
On a bill to eliminate wage discrimination based on the sex
of an employee, an amendment to make the bill applicable to discrimination
based on race was ruled out of order as not germane.
On a bill authorizing funds for the
federal highway program, an amendment permitting the Governor
of a State to divert funds from the highway program to urban mass
transportation projects was ruled out of order as not germane.
If a proposal would merely require an
investigation of a subject, an amendment to require that a certain
action be undertaken regarding that subject is not germane.
B. FUNDAMENTAL PURPOSE
1. The fundamental purpose of the
amendment must relate to the fundamental purpose of the bill.
The purpose of the bill is judged from its text, not from debate
statements.
Example:
To a title of a bill designed to enable federal agencies to formulate
energy conservation policies, an amendment prohibiting certain
uses of fuel (for school busing) by any person was held not
germane.
2. An amendment must not only have
a related purpose, but must accomplish that purpose by a method
that is closely allied to the method used in the bill.
Examples:
To a bill conserving energy by imposing civil penalties on manufacturers
of autos with low gas mileage, an amendment conserving energy
by offering tax rebates to a purchaser of high-mileage autos was
held not to be germane.
To an amendment to achieve a national
production goal for synthetic fuels for national defense needs
by loans and grants and development of demonstration synthetic
fuel plants, a substitute to require by regulation that any fuel
sold in commerce require a certain percentage of synthetic fuels
was held not to be germane.
Germaneness, page 3
C. COMMITTEE JURISDICTION
1. An amendment should be within
the subject matter of the committee of jurisdiction of a bill.
Committee jurisdiction of an amendment is not determinative when
the jurisdiction of the bill overlaps several committees.
Example:
To a bill requiring drug testing of airline and bus employees
in the Committee on Public Works and Transportation, an amendment
adding rail employees (within the jurisdiction of the Commerce
Committee) was held not to be germane.
D. INDIVIDUAL PROPOSITION
1. One individual proposition may
not be amended by another individual proposition, even though
the two belong to the same class.
Example:
To a bill providing for the disposal of tin from the national
stockpile, an amendment for the disposal of silver from the national
stockpile was held not to be germane.
2. To a bill relating to one class
of individuals or things, an amendment relating to another
class is not germane.
Example:
To a bill authorizing categorical grants to certain private
entities furnishing health care to medically under-served
populations, an amendment authorizing direct grants to states
for control of a certain public health hazard was held not
to be germane as relating to different categories of recipients.
E. GENERAL PROVISION TO A SPECIFIC
SUBJECT
1. A specific proposition may not
be amended by a proposition more general in scope.
Examples:
To a bill relating to aircraft altitude over national parks,
an amendment relating to aircraft collision avoidance generally
is not germane.
To a bill proscribing certain picketing
in the District of Columbia, an amendment making the provisions
thereof applicable throughout the United States is not germane.
F. SPECIFIC SUBJECTS TO GENERAL PROPOSITIONS
1. A general subject may be amended
by a specific proposition (or subset) of the same class.
2. One key test of whether a subject
is general is whether it covers two or more categories within
a class.
Examples:
If a bill requires drug testing of airline employees, an amendment
to extend the requirement to bus employees was not germane
(an individual proposition cannot be amended by another individual
proposition). However, if the bill covers airline and bus employees,
an amendment to add barge employees would be germane.
Germaneness, page 4
To an omnibus agricultural bill containing
farm programs affecting dairy products, wool, feed, grains, cotton,
and wheat, an amendment to add a new title to the bill relating
to poultry and eggs was held to be germane.
To a bill affecting price supports
for dairy products generally, an amendment relating to milk
marketing order is germane.
3. The more broad the subject matter
of the bill, the more that can be added as a germane amendment.
Example:
A section of a bill designed to strengthen the United States
and NATO relationships with Turkey and Greece in diverse ways
(by promoting a peaceful solution to the Cypress dispute, by easing
the embargo on arms shipments to Turkey, by requesting negotiations
with Greece to determine its economic and military needs, and
by providing refugee assistance to Cypress) was held sufficiently
broad in scope to permit as germane an amendment requesting
negotiations with Turkey to prevent diversion of opium poppy into
illicit channels.
G. PERMANENT AMENDMENT TO TEMPORARY
PROVISION
1. To a bill proposing a temporary
change in law, an amendment making permanent changes in that
law is not germane.
Example:
An amendment making permanent changes in the law relating to
the organization of an agency is not germane to a title
of a bill only authorizing appropriations for such agency for
one fiscal year.
IV. RESTRICTIONS, CONDITIONS, QUALIFICATIONS,
LIMITATIONS, CONTINGENCIES
A. Restrictions, conditions, qualifications,
limitations, and contingencies to a proposition which are sought
by amendment are germane if they are related to the general
purpose of the proposition.
1. In general, these may include: an exception to or an exemption from a proposition; a
limitation on a delegation of authority; restriction on the use of funds authorized or
appropriated by a bill; making
a provision contingent upon a related event; or a restriction
on the classes covered by the bill.
Examples:
To a bill prohibiting the issuance of injunctions by the courts
in labor disputes, an amendment to except all labor disputes affecting
public utilities is germane.
To a bill authorizing federal assistance
on the city, state, and national levels for projects to prevent
juvenile delinquency, an amendment to limit the federal assistance
to projects within the District of Columbia was held to be germane.
An amendment conditioning availability
of a bill's funds upon implementation by the recipients of another
program related to that general purpose is germane.
But an amendment conditioning the availability
of funds to certain recipients based upon their compliance with
Federal law not otherwise applicable to them (and within the jurisdiction
of other House committees) is not germane.
Germaneness, page 5
To a bill amending a statute, an amendment
prohibiting assistance under that act or under any other act for
a particular purpose was held to be too general in scope, affecting
laws not being amended by the bill and was ruled out or order
as not germane.
An amendment delaying the operation
of proposed legislation pending an unrelated contingency is not
germane. Thus to a bill authorizing Federal financial contributions
to international lending institutions, an amendment making those
contributions contingent upon enactment of a change in federal
monetary policy having domestic implications and involving agencies
beyond the scope of the bill is not germane.
V. RELATION OF AMENDMENT/BILL TO
EXISTING LAW
A. In general, an amendment must be
germane to the pending bill, not to the underlying law
to be changed. The determination of whether a bill which amends
existing law opens the entire law to amendment follows the principles
that a general proposition an be amended by specific propositions
(or subsets) of the same class.
1. Where a bill amends existing
law in one narrow particular, an amendment proposing to modify
the existing law in other particulars will be ruled out of order
as not germane.
2. To a bill amending existing law
in several particulars, but relating to a single subject, an
amendment proposing to modify the law but not related to the same
single subject is not germane.
3. But a bill amending several
sections of an existing law may be sufficiently broad to permit
amendments which are germane to other sections of that law not
included in the bill.
4. A bill may so extensively amend
an existing law as to open the entire law to amendment, even
to repeal the existing law. The bill amending the law must so
vitally affect the whole law as to bring the entire act under
consideration.
Examples:
To an amendment in the nature of a substitute comprehensively
amending several sections of the Clean Air Act with respect to
the impact of the shortage of energy resources upon standards
imposed under that Act, an amendment to another section of that
Act suspending for a temporary period the authority of the Administrator
of the EPA to control automobile emissions was held to be germane.
To a bill amending several sections
of the National Foundation for the Arts and Humanities Act to
extend the authorization for appropriations and redefine certain
powers of the foundation, an amendment proposing to further amend
the Act to establish an office of Poet Laureate of the United
States was ruled out of order as not germane.
Where a bill repeals a provision of
law, an amendment modifying (but not repealing) that provision
may be germane; but the modification must relate to the provision
of law being repealed.
Germaneness, page 6
VI. HOUSE/SENATE RELATIONS
A. House amendments to Senate amendments
1. A House amendment must be germane
to the Senate amendment, not to the House bill.
2. But where a Senate amendment proposes
to strike out language in a House bill, the test of the germaneness
on a motion to recede and concur with an amendment is the relationship
between the language in the motion and the provisions in the
House bill proposed to be stricken, as well as those to be inserted
by the Senate amendment.
3. The test of germaneness of an
amendment to a motion to concur in a Senate amendment with
an amendment is the relationship between the amendment and
the motion. It is not between the amendment and the Senate amendment
to which the motion was offered.
B. Senate amendments - matters in
conference reports
1. Clause 4 of rule XXVIII permits
a point of order against language in a conference report which
was originally in the Senate bill that would not have been germane
if offered to the House-passed version. If the point of order
is sustained, a separate motion is permitted to reject that
portion of the conference report.
2. Clause 5 of rule XXVIII permits
a similar point of order against a motion to concur, or to concur
with an amendment, in non-germane Senate amendments, the stage
of disagreement having been reached.
3. Clause 7 of rule XVI permits a point of order against Senate amendments to House bills if the amendment contains language which would not have been germane if offered in the House.